• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咀嚼砂纸:陷于沙地植物中的沙粒、植物显见性与植物防御

Chewing sandpaper: grit, plant apparency, and plant defense in sand-entrapping plants.

作者信息

LoPresti Eric F, Karban Richard

出版信息

Ecology. 2016 Apr;97(4):826-33. doi: 10.1890/15-1696.1.

DOI:10.1890/15-1696.1
PMID:27220199
Abstract

Sand entrapment on plant surfaces, termed psammophory or sand armor, is a phylogenetically and geographically widespread trait. The functional significance of this phenomenon has been poorly investigated. Sand and soil are nonnutritive and difficult for herbivores to process, as well as visually identical to the background. We experimentally investigated whether this sand coating physically protected the plant from herbivores or increased crypsis (e.g., decreased apparency to herbivores). We tested the former hypothesis by removing entrapped sand from stems, petioles, and leaves of the sand verbena Abronia latifolia and by supplementing natural sand levels in the honeyscented pincushion plant Navarretia mellita. Consistent with a physical defensive function, leaves with sand present or supplemented suffered less chewing herbivory than those with sand removed or left as is. To test a possible crypsis effect, we coated some sand verbena stems with green sand, matching the stem color, as well as others with brown sand to match the background color. Both suffered less chewing herbivory than controls with no sand and herbivory did not significantly differ between the colors, suggesting crypsis was not the driving resistance mechanism. Strong tests of plant apparency are rare; this experimental approach may be possible in other systems and represents one of few manipulative tests of this long-standing hypothesis.

摘要

植物表面的沙粒附着现象,即所谓的沙粒附着或沙甲,是一种在系统发育和地理分布上广泛存在的特征。这一现象的功能意义尚未得到充分研究。沙子和土壤没有营养,食草动物难以处理,而且在视觉上与背景相同。我们通过实验研究了这种沙质覆盖层是否能在物理上保护植物免受食草动物侵害,或者是否能增加植物的隐蔽性(例如,降低被食草动物发现的可能性)。我们通过去除宽叶砂马鞭草(Abronia latifolia)茎、叶柄和叶片上附着的沙子,以及增加蜜香针垫花(Navarretia mellita)的自然沙量,来检验前一个假设。与物理防御功能一致,有沙子附着或添加了沙子的叶片比去除了沙子或未处理的叶片遭受的咀嚼式食草动物侵害更少。为了测试可能的隐蔽效果,我们用与茎颜色匹配的绿色沙子以及与背景颜色匹配的棕色沙子覆盖了一些砂马鞭草的茎。两者遭受的咀嚼式食草动物侵害都比没有沙子的对照组少,而且两种颜色之间的食草动物侵害没有显著差异,这表明隐蔽性不是主要的抗性机制。对植物明显度的有力测试很少见;这种实验方法在其他系统中可能可行,并且是对这一长期假设的少数操纵性测试之一。

相似文献

1
Chewing sandpaper: grit, plant apparency, and plant defense in sand-entrapping plants.咀嚼砂纸:陷于沙地植物中的沙粒、植物显见性与植物防御
Ecology. 2016 Apr;97(4):826-33. doi: 10.1890/15-1696.1.
2
Mucilage-bound sand reduces seed predation by ants but not by reducing apparency: a field test of 53 plant species.黏液结合沙粒减少了蚂蚁对种子的捕食,但并没有降低其可见性:对 53 种植物的野外测试。
Ecology. 2019 Oct;100(10):e02809. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2809. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests.亚马逊森林中植物的生长-防御权衡与栖息地特化
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S150-62. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[150:tgtahs]2.0.co;2.
4
Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide: the importance of enemies and apparency in adaptation to harsh soil environments.无处可逃,无处可藏:敌害和表象在适应恶劣土壤环境中的重要性。
Am Nat. 2013 Jul;182(1):E1-14. doi: 10.1086/670754. Epub 2013 May 22.
5
Large herbivores promote habitat specialization and beta diversity of African savanna trees.大型食草动物促进了非洲热带稀树草原树木的栖息地特化和β多样性。
Ecology. 2016 Oct;97(10):2640-2657. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1522.
6
Additive effects of aboveground polyphagous herbivores and soil feedback in native and range-expanding exotic plants.地上多食性草食动物和土壤反馈对本地和外来扩散植物的附加效应。
Ecology. 2011 Jun;92(6):1344-52. doi: 10.1890/10-1937.1.
7
Tolerance and phenological avoidance of herbivory in tarweed species.菊科粘冠草属植物对食草动物的耐受性和物候回避
Ecology. 2016 May;97(5):1357-63. doi: 10.1890/15-1454.1.
8
Leaf mimicry in a climbing plant protects against herbivory.攀援植物的叶子拟态可抵御食草动物的侵害。
Curr Biol. 2014 May 5;24(9):984-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
Insect herbivores, chemical innovation, and the evolution of habit specialization in Amazonian trees.昆虫食草动物、化学创新与亚马逊树种习性特化的进化
Ecology. 2013 Aug;94(8):1764-75. doi: 10.1890/12-1920.1.
10
Contemporary evolution of plant growth rate following experimental removal of herbivores.实验去除食草动物后植物生长率的当代演变。
Am Nat. 2013 May;181 Suppl 1:S21-34. doi: 10.1086/668075. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Sand-trapping mechanism in psammophyte Ifloga spicata (Asteraceae).沙生植物沙鞭(菊科)的沙粒捕获机制。
Protoplasma. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00709-025-02107-4.
2
Sticky plants and plant-based glues: potential for pest control.具粘性的植物和植物基胶水:害虫防治的潜力。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jul 8;16:1612368. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1612368. eCollection 2025.
3
Reassessing assumptions about the evolution of herbivore teeth.重新评估关于食草动物牙齿进化的假设。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 10;120(2):e2219060120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219060120. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
4
Defensive functions and potential ecological conflicts of floral stickiness.花的粘性的防御功能和潜在的生态冲突。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 18;12(1):19848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23261-2.
5
Do calcium oxalate crystals protect against herbivory?草酸钙晶体能防止食草动物侵害吗?
Naturwissenschaften. 2021 May 27;108(3):24. doi: 10.1007/s00114-021-01735-z.
6
Global pattern of plant utilization across different organisms: Does plant apparency or plant phylogeny matter?不同生物对植物利用的全球模式:植物的易见性还是植物系统发育更重要?
Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 14;7(8):2535-2545. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2882. eCollection 2017 Apr.