Barton Michelle DeChant, Detwiller Kara Y, Palmer Andrew D, Schindler Joshua S
School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2016 Dec;126(12):2705-2710. doi: 10.1002/lary.26046. Epub 2016 May 25.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine whether the application of laser-assisted techniques for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum would reduce the failure rate of endoscopic procedures without compromising safety or durability.
Cohort study with long-term follow-up.
We performed a single-institution review of 106 consecutive patients in whom endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy (ELD) or endoscopic stapler-assisted diverticulotomy (ESD) was attempted. The Eating Assessment Tool was collected pre- and postoperatively. Long-term follow-up was conducted on average 2.4 years postoperatively.
The decision to use either ELD or ESD was made intraoperatively. An endoscopic procedure was successfully completed in 103 of 106 patients (97.2%). Eighty-three patients underwent ELD, 20 underwent ESD, and only three required use of an open approach. No serious complications occurred. Postoperatively, there was a significant reduction in dysphagia symptoms. At follow-up, most individuals had dysphagia scores within the normal range (69%) and were eating a regular diet (73%). Fourteen patients (14%) required revision. Compared to historical data from our institution for ESD alone, the addition of ELD resulted in a reduction in the failure rate without an increase in serious complications. Recurrence rates and long-term outcomes were equivalent.
Through careful patient selection, appropriate workup, and judicious use of techniques, it was possible to perform endoscopic surgery in a majority of patients without serious complications. Both approaches resulted in short- and long-term symptom management with high levels of satisfaction.
目的/假设:确定应用激光辅助技术治疗Zenker憩室是否会降低内镜手术的失败率,同时不影响安全性或持久性。
长期随访的队列研究。
我们对106例连续患者进行了单机构回顾性研究,这些患者均尝试了内镜激光辅助憩室切开术(ELD)或内镜吻合器辅助憩室切开术(ESD)。术前和术后收集饮食评估工具。术后平均随访2.4年。
术中决定使用ELD或ESD。106例患者中有103例(97.2%)成功完成了内镜手术。83例患者接受了ELD,20例接受了ESD,只有3例需要采用开放手术。未发生严重并发症。术后吞咽困难症状明显减轻。随访时,大多数患者的吞咽困难评分在正常范围内(69%),并能正常饮食(73%)。14例患者(14%)需要再次手术。与我们机构单独ESD的历史数据相比,增加ELD导致失败率降低,且严重并发症未增加。复发率和长期结果相当。
通过仔细的患者选择、适当的检查和明智地使用技术,大多数患者可以进行内镜手术而无严重并发症。两种方法都能实现短期和长期的症状管理,患者满意度高。
4。《喉镜》,2016年,第126卷,第2705 - 2710页。