Department of Medicine D, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Clinical Research Unit, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Nov;35:100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 24.
The outcome of mechanically ventilated patients initially denied admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and subsequently admitted is unclear. We compared outcomes of patients denied ICU admission and subsequently admitted, to those of patients admitted to the ICU and to patients refused ICU admission. The medical records of all the patients who were subjected to mechanical ventilation for at least 24h over a 4year period (2010-2014) were reviewed. Of 707 patients (757 admissions), 124 (18%) were initially denied ICU admission and subsequently admitted. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis showed significant association with death of: age, length of stay, nursing home residency, duration of mechanical ventilation, previous admission with mechanical ventilation, cause for mechanical ventilation, rate of failed extubations, associated morbidity (previous cerebrovascular accident, dementia, chronic renal failure), and occurrence of nosocomial bacteremia. The odds for death among patients denied ICU admission and subsequently transferred to the ICU compared to patients admitted directly to the ICU was 3.6 (95% CI: 1.9-6.7) (P<0.0001). The odds for death among patients refused ICU admission compared to those who were initially denied and subsequently admitted were not statistically significant (OR=1.7, 95% CI: 0.8-3.8). In conclusion, patients denied ICU admission and subsequently admitted face a considerable risk of morbidity and mortality. Their odds of death are nearly three times those admitted directly to the ICU. Late admission to the ICU does not appear to provide benefit compared to patients who remain in general medicine wards.
最初被拒绝入住重症监护病房(ICU)但随后被收治的机械通气患者的结局尚不清楚。我们比较了拒绝 ICU 收治并随后收治的患者、直接收治 ICU 的患者和拒绝 ICU 收治的患者的结局。回顾了在 4 年期间(2010-2014 年)接受至少 24 小时机械通气的所有患者的病历。在 707 名患者(757 次入院)中,有 124 名(18%)最初被拒绝入住 ICU 并随后收治。多变量逐步逻辑回归分析显示,与死亡显著相关的因素有:年龄、住院时间、疗养院居住、机械通气时间、既往机械通气入院、机械通气原因、拔管失败率、相关合并症(既往脑血管意外、痴呆、慢性肾衰竭)和医院获得性菌血症的发生。与直接收治 ICU 的患者相比,被拒绝 ICU 收治但随后转至 ICU 的患者的死亡风险比为 3.6(95%CI:1.9-6.7)(P<0.0001)。与最初被拒绝并随后收治的患者相比,拒绝 ICU 收治的患者的死亡风险比无统计学意义(OR=1.7,95%CI:0.8-3.8)。总之,被拒绝 ICU 收治但随后收治的患者面临相当大的发病率和死亡率风险。他们的死亡风险几乎是直接收治 ICU 的患者的三倍。与留在普通病房的患者相比,晚期入住 ICU 似乎并不能带来益处。