Abad-García María Francisca, González-Teruel Aurora, Solís Sánchez Gonzalo
Departamento de Historia de la Ciencia y Documentación, Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, España.
Departamento de Historia de la Ciencia y Documentación, Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, España.
An Pediatr (Barc). 2017 Jun;86(6):306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 25.
To identify Spanish funded paediatric research published in general paediatric journals included in the Web of Science (WoS) from 2010 to 2014) and those published in the Anales de Pediatría. To examine the relationship between funding and the prestige of the journals. To describe the journal conditions to meet the open access criteria.
Spanish funded paediatric articles (FA) were identified by using the WoS Funding Agency field, and by reviewing the original documents for the Anales de Pediatria (AP). For the FA published in AP the number and kind of funding agencies were identified. The possible differences in citations between FA and non-funded was assessed for articles published in this journal using the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test. For general journals, the patterns of distribution of FA and non-FA were investigated according to the quartile of the journal. The journal's self-archiving conditions were described using Sherpa/romeo database.
Funding was received for 27.5%, being 16.6% for those published in AP. In these, 105 funding agencies were identified, with 80% being national. The FA published in AP did not receive significantly more citations. In general journals, the presence of FA is greater in Q1 and Q2 journals. More than half (56%) of articles were published in subscription journals. All journals that publish FA allow self-archiving in repositories, but with embargos of at least 12 months.
The role of AP in the dissemination of FA is still limited. Embargos in self-archiving permits compliance of Spanish open access mandate, but may hinder compliance in Europe.
识别2010年至2014年在科学网(WoS)收录的普通儿科学期刊以及《儿科年鉴》上发表的由西班牙资助的儿科研究。研究资助与期刊声望之间的关系。描述期刊满足开放获取标准的情况。
通过使用WoS资助机构字段,并查阅《儿科年鉴》(AP)的原始文献,识别由西班牙资助的儿科文章(FA)。对于发表在AP上的FA,确定资助机构的数量和类型。使用Kruskal-Wallis非参数检验评估该期刊上发表的FA与非资助文章之间引用次数的可能差异。对于普通期刊,根据期刊的四分位数研究FA和非FA的分布模式。使用Sherpa/romeo数据库描述期刊的自我存档情况。
27.5%的文章获得了资助,其中发表在AP上的占16.6%。在这些文章中,确定了105个资助机构,其中80%是国家机构。发表在AP上的FA没有获得显著更多的引用。在普通期刊中,FA在Q1和Q2期刊中的占比更大。超过一半(56%)的文章发表在订阅期刊上。所有发表FA的期刊都允许在知识库中进行自我存档,但至少有12个月的禁售期。
AP在FA传播中的作用仍然有限。自我存档中的禁售期允许符合西班牙的开放获取要求,但可能会阻碍在欧洲的合规性。