Craxford S, Bayley E, Walsh M, Clamp J, Boszczyk B M, Stokes O M
Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK.
Nottingham University Hospitals, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):825-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.37435.
Identifying cervical spine injuries in confused or comatose patients with multiple injuries provides a diagnostic challenge. Our aim was to investigate the protocols which are used for the clearance of the cervical spine in these patients in English hospitals.
All hospitals in England with an Emergency Department were asked about the protocols which they use for assessing the cervical spine. All 22 Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) and 141 of 156 non-MTCs responded (response rate 91.5%).
Written guidelines were used in 138 hospitals (85%). CT scanning was the first-line investigation in 122 (75%). A normal CT scan was sufficient to clear the cervical spine in 73 (45%). However, 40 (25%) would continue precautions until the patient regained full consciousness. MRI was performed in all confused or comatose patients with a possible cervical spinal injury in 15 (9%). There were variations in the grade and speciality of the clinician who had responsibility for deciding when to discontinue precautions. A total of 31 (19%) reported at least one missed cervical spinal injury following discontinuation of spinal precautions within the last five years. Only 93 (57%) had a formal mechanism for reviewing missed injuries.
There are significant variations in protocols and practices for the clearance of the cervical spine in multiply injured patients in acute hospitals in England. The establishment of trauma networks should be taken as an opportunity to further standardise trauma care. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:825-8.
在伴有多处损伤的意识模糊或昏迷患者中识别颈椎损伤是一项诊断挑战。我们的目的是调查英国医院用于这些患者颈椎解除固定的方案。
我们向英格兰所有设有急诊科的医院询问了他们用于评估颈椎的方案。22家主要创伤中心(MTC)和156家非MTC中的141家做出了回应(回应率91.5%)。
138家医院(85%)使用了书面指南。122家(75%)将CT扫描作为一线检查手段。73家(45%)认为正常的CT扫描足以解除颈椎固定。然而,40家(25%)会继续采取预防措施,直到患者完全清醒。15家(9%)对所有意识模糊或昏迷且可能存在颈椎损伤的患者进行了MRI检查。在决定何时停止预防措施的临床医生的级别和专业方面存在差异。共有31家(19%)报告在过去五年内停止脊柱预防措施后至少有一例颈椎损伤漏诊。只有93家(57%)有审查漏诊损伤的正式机制。
在英格兰急症医院中,多处受伤患者颈椎解除固定的方案和做法存在显著差异。应利用创伤网络的建立进一步规范创伤护理。引用本文:《骨与关节杂志》2016年;98 - B:825 - 8。