Sharma Abhinav, Rodrigues Shobha J, Shetty Thilak B, Shenoy Vidya K, Mundathaje Mahesh, Saldanha Sharon
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, A. J. Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Mar-Apr;27(2):190-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.183136.
Castability has been found to be affected by many aspects of the entire casting system. Very few references in dental literature are available regarding recasting of the base metal alloys.
To evaluate and compare the castability of fresh and reused nickel-chromium alloy and to evaluate the effect of two brands of investment materials on castability of nickel-chromium alloy.
For the experimental purpose of evaluation of the effect of recasting of nickel-chromium alloy on its castability, different percentages of new and casted alloy (Nickel-chromium alloy-(Wirolloy NB, Type 4 (Ni-67%; Cr-25%; Mo-5%; Si-1.5%; Mn, Nb, B, C each <1%) and two commercial brands of investment materials namely, Deguvest Impact (Degudent; Dentsply Germany) and Bellavest SH (Degudent; Dentsply Germany) was used to obtain 30 samples. Castability value was obtained using Whitlock's formula. Student t-test and one way ANOVA using SPSS 20.0 software was done.
The results of this study confirm earlier works that demonstrate that there is no significant difference in castability values of new and recast alloys. In addition, it also demonstrated, there was no difference in castability using Deguvest Impact and Bellavest SH investment materials.
Within the limitations of the study, it was concluded that there was no significant difference found in castability of different percentage combinations of new and once casted alloy using two investment materials. The addition of new alloy during recasting to maintain the castability of nickel-chromium alloy may therefore not be required.
铸造性能已被发现会受到整个铸造系统诸多方面的影响。牙科文献中关于贱金属合金再铸造的参考文献非常少。
评估并比较新鲜和再利用的镍铬合金的铸造性能,并评估两种品牌的包埋材料对镍铬合金铸造性能的影响。
为了通过实验评估镍铬合金再铸造对其铸造性能的影响,使用不同比例的新合金和铸造后的合金(镍铬合金 -(Wirolloy NB,4型(Ni - 67%;Cr - 25%;Mo - 5%;Si - 1.5%;Mn、Nb、B、C各<1%))以及两种商业品牌的包埋材料,即Deguvest Impact(德国登士柏德固德)和Bellavest SH(德国登士柏德固德)来获取30个样本。使用惠特洛克公式获得铸造性能值。使用SPSS 20.0软件进行学生t检验和单因素方差分析。
本研究结果证实了早期的研究成果,即新合金和再铸造合金的铸造性能值没有显著差异。此外,研究还表明,使用Deguvest Impact和Bellavest SH包埋材料时,铸造性能没有差异。
在本研究的局限性范围内,得出的结论是,使用两种包埋材料时,新合金和一次铸造合金的不同百分比组合的铸造性能没有显著差异。因此,在再铸造过程中可能不需要添加新合金来维持镍铬合金的铸造性能。