Maleux Geert, Indesteege Inge, Laenen Annouschka, Verslype Chris, Vergote Ignace, Prenen Hans
Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Biostatistics and and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt, Belgium.
Radiol Oncol. 2016 Feb 7;50(2):197-203. doi: 10.1515/raon-2016-0002. eCollection 2016 Jun 1.
To assess the technical and clinical outcome of percutaneous insertion of tunneled peritoneal catheters in the palliative treatment of refractory malignant ascites and to determine the safety and feasibility of intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs through the tunneled catheter.
Consecutive patients palliatively treated with a tunneled peritoneal catheter to drain the malignant ascites were identified. Patients' medical history, procedural and clinical follow-up data, including complications and estimated survival, were reviewed. Additionally, a sub analysis of the patients with widespread ovarian cancer and refractory ascites treated with or without intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs was made.
In all 94 patients it was technically feasible to insert the peritoneal drainage catheter and to drain a median of 3260 cc (range 100 cc - 8500 cc) of malignant ascitic fluid. Post procedural complications included catheter infection (n = 2; 2%), fluid leakage around the entry site (n = 4; 4%), catheter occlusion (n = 2; 2%), sleeve formation around the catheter tip (n = 1; 1%) and accidental loss of the catheter (n = 1; 1%). There was no increase in catheter infection rate in patients treated with or without intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic drugs. Median overall survival after catheter insertion is 1.7 months.
Percutaneous insertion of a tunneled Tenckhoff catheter for the palliative drainage of malignant ascites and intraperitoneal infusion of cytotoxic drugs is feasible and associated with a very low complication rate, including catheter infection. These tunneled peritoneal lines are beneficial for symptomatic palliative treatment of refractory ascites and allow safe intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
评估经皮插入隧道式腹膜导管在难治性恶性腹水姑息治疗中的技术和临床效果,并确定通过隧道式导管腹腔内给予细胞毒性药物的安全性和可行性。
确定连续接受隧道式腹膜导管姑息治疗以引流恶性腹水的患者。回顾患者的病史、操作和临床随访数据,包括并发症和估计生存期。此外,对接受或未接受腹腔内细胞毒性药物治疗的广泛卵巢癌和难治性腹水患者进行了亚组分析。
在所有94例患者中,插入腹膜引流导管并引流中位3260 cc(范围100 cc - 8500 cc)恶性腹水在技术上是可行的。术后并发症包括导管感染(n = 2;2%)、入口部位周围漏液(n = 4;4%)、导管堵塞(n = 2;2%)、导管尖端周围形成套袖(n = 1;1%)和导管意外丢失(n = 1;1%)。接受或未接受腹腔内细胞毒性药物治疗的患者导管感染率均未增加。导管插入后的中位总生存期为1.7个月。
经皮插入隧道式Tenckhoff导管用于恶性腹水的姑息引流和腹腔内输注细胞毒性药物是可行的,且并发症发生率极低,包括导管感染。这些隧道式腹膜导管有利于难治性腹水的对症姑息治疗,并允许安全的腹腔内化疗。