Umwali Aurore, Askar Haitham, Paris Sebastian, Schwendicke Falk
Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14199 Berlin, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 2;6:27319. doi: 10.1038/srep27319.
Selectively excavated carious lesions remain radiographically detectable. Radiopaque tagging could resolve the resulting diagnostic uncertainty. We aimed to evaluate if tagging depends on lesions depths, is antibacterial, or affects dentin bond-strengths. Artificial lesions (depth-range: 152-682 μm, n = 34/group) were induced in human dentin samples, evaluated using wavelength-independent microradiography, treated with one of two tagging materials (70% SnCl2, 30% SnF2) and re-evaluated. To evaluate antimicrobial effects, 40 dentin samples were submitted to a Lactobacillus rhamnosus invasion-model. Infected samples were treated with placebo, 0.2% chlorhexidine, SnCl2, SnF2 (n = 10/group). Dentin was sampled and colony-forming units/mg determined. Micro-tensile bond-strengths of adhesive restorations (OptiBond FL, Filtek Z250) to tagged or untagged, sound and carious dentin were assessed (n = 12/group). Tagged surfaces were evaluated microscopically and via energy-dispersive X-ray-spectroscopy (EDS). Tagging effects of both materials decreased with increasing lesion depths (p < 0.001). Un-/chlorhexidine-treated dentin contained significantly more viable bacteria (median 7.3/3.7 × 10(5) CFU/mg) than tagged dentin (no CFU detectable, p < 0.001). Tagging decreased bond strengths (p < 0.001) on sound (-22%/-33% for SnCl2/SnF2) and carious dentin (-50%/-54%). This might be due to widespread tin chloride or fluoride precipitation, as detected via microscopy and EDS. While radiopaque tagging seems beneficial, an optimized application protocol needs to be developed prior clinical use.
选择性挖掘的龋损在影像学上仍可被检测到。不透射线标记可解决由此产生的诊断不确定性。我们旨在评估标记是否取决于病变深度、是否具有抗菌性或是否影响牙本质粘结强度。在人牙本质样本中诱导人工病变(深度范围:152 - 682μm,每组n = 34),使用与波长无关的显微放射摄影进行评估,用两种标记材料之一(70% 氯化亚锡、30% 氟化亚锡)处理后再次评估。为评估抗菌效果,将40个牙本质样本用于鼠李糖乳杆菌侵袭模型。感染的样本用安慰剂、0.2% 氯己定、氯化亚锡、氟化亚锡处理(每组n = 10)。采集牙本质样本并测定每毫克的菌落形成单位。评估粘结修复体(OptiBond FL、Filtek Z250)与标记或未标记的健康和龋坏牙本质之间的微拉伸粘结强度(每组n = 12)。通过显微镜和能量色散X射线光谱(EDS)对标记表面进行评估。两种材料的标记效果均随病变深度增加而降低(p < 0.001)。未处理/用氯己定处理的牙本质中存活细菌显著多于标记牙本质(中位数分别为7.3/3.7×10⁵CFU/mg)(无可检测到的CFU,p < 0.001)。标记降低了健康牙本质(氯化亚锡/氟化亚锡分别降低22%/33%)和龋坏牙本质(降低50%/54%)上的粘结强度(p < 0.001)。这可能是由于通过显微镜和EDS检测到的广泛的氯化亚锡或氟化物沉淀。虽然不透射线标记似乎有益,但在临床使用前需要制定优化的应用方案。