Rade M, Könönen M, Marttila J, Shacklock M, Vanninen R, Kankaanpää M, Airaksinen O
Kuopio University Hospital, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kuopio, Finland.
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Medicine, Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Hospital "Prim. dr.Martin Horvat", Rovinj, Croatia.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2;11(6):e0155927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155927. eCollection 2016.
Normal displacement of the conus medullaris with unilateral and bilateral SLR has been quantified and the "principle of linear dependence" has been described.
Explore whether previously recorded movements of conus medullaris with SLRs are i) primarily due to transmission of tensile forces transmitted through the neural tissues during SLR or ii) the result of reciprocal movements between vertebrae and nerves.
Controlled radiologic study.
Ten asymptomatic volunteers were scanned with a 1.5T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner using T2 weighted spc 3D scanning sequences and a device that permits greater ranges of SLR. Displacement of the conus medullaris during the unilateral and sham SLR was quantified reliably with a randomized procedure. Conus displacement in response to unilateral and sham SLRs was quantified and the results compared.
The conus displaced caudally in the spinal canal by 3.54±0.87 mm (mean±SD) with unilateral (p≤.001) and proximally by 0.32±1.6 mm with sham SLR (p≤.542). Pearson correlations were higher than 0.99 for both intra- and inter-observer reliability and the observed power was 1 for unilateral SLRs and 0.054 and 0.149 for left and right sham SLR respectively.
Four relevant points emerge from the presented data: i) reciprocal movements between the spinal cord and the surrounding vertebrae are likely to occur during SLR in asymptomatic subjects, ii) conus medullaris displacement in the vertebral canal with SLR is primarily due to transmission of tensile forces through the neural tissues, iii) when tensile forces are transmitted through the neural system as in the clinical SLR, the magnitude of conus medullaris displacement prevails over the amount of bone adjustment.
已对单侧和双侧直腿抬高时脊髓圆锥的正常位移进行了量化,并描述了“线性依赖原理”。
探讨先前记录的脊髓圆锥在直腿抬高时的运动是i)主要由于直腿抬高期间通过神经组织传递的拉力,还是ii)椎骨和神经之间相互运动的结果。
对照放射学研究。
使用T2加权spc 3D扫描序列和允许更大范围直腿抬高的设备,对10名无症状志愿者进行1.5T磁共振(MR)扫描仪扫描。通过随机程序可靠地量化单侧和假直腿抬高期间脊髓圆锥的位移。对单侧和假直腿抬高时脊髓圆锥的位移进行量化并比较结果。
单侧直腿抬高时脊髓圆锥在椎管内向尾侧移位3.54±0.87mm(平均值±标准差)(p≤0.001),假直腿抬高时向头侧移位0.32±1.6mm(p≤0.542)。观察者内和观察者间可靠性的Pearson相关性均高于0.99,单侧直腿抬高的观察效能为1,左侧和右侧假直腿抬高的观察效能分别为0.054和0.149。
从所呈现的数据中得出四个相关要点:i)无症状受试者在直腿抬高期间脊髓与周围椎骨之间可能发生相互运动;ii)直腿抬高时椎管内脊髓圆锥的位移主要是由于拉力通过神经组织传递;iii)当如临床直腿抬高那样通过神经系统传递拉力时,脊髓圆锥位移的幅度超过骨骼调整的量。