Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Mar;29(3):304-319. doi: 10.1037/pas0000337. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Mania is the core criterion for bipolar disorder, a chronic and severe psychiatric illness centrally associated with positive affective disturbance. Many self-report measures have been created to assess symptoms of, and risk for, mania but there are notable disparities in their length, scope, and content. Thus, the goal of this study was to determine the structure and correlates of a number of widely used "bipolar-relevant" (BR) measures (e.g., Hypomanic Personality Scale, Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale, General Behavior Inventory, Mood Disorder Questionnaire). Data from a community sample (Study 1, N = 329) and a student sample assessed at two time points (Study 2; Ns = 382 and 308, respectively) provided strong evidence that the BR measures were characterized by both (a) a well-defined common dimension when a single factor was extracted, and (b) a clear structure of Emotional Lability and Activated Positive Affect upon extracting two factors. The general factor showed a relatively nonspecific pattern of associations with personality and psychopathology. In contrast, the Emotional Lability factor showed its strongest relations with neuroticism and depressive symptoms, displaying comparatively weaker relations with measures of extraversion and positive emotionality. Conversely, although Activated Positive Affect also associated positively with depressive symptoms and with neuroticism in some instances, its strongest relations were with measures of extraversion and high arousal positive emotionality. These findings suggest that measures defining Emotional Lability seem to assess mood volatility to a greater extent, whereas measures defining the Activated Positive Affect factor capture an intense, high arousal form of positive emotionality. (PsycINFO Database Record
躁狂是双相情感障碍的核心标准,这是一种严重的慢性精神疾病,主要与积极的情感障碍有关。已经创建了许多自我报告的措施来评估躁狂的症状和风险,但它们在长度、范围和内容上存在显著差异。因此,本研究的目的是确定一些广泛使用的“双相相关”(BR)措施的结构和相关性(例如,轻躁狂人格量表、Altman 自我评定躁狂量表、一般行为量表、情绪障碍问卷)。来自社区样本(研究 1,N=329)和两个时间点评估的学生样本(研究 2;N=382 和 308)的数据提供了强有力的证据,表明 BR 措施的特点是:(a)当提取单个因素时,具有明确界定的共同维度;(b)提取两个因素时,具有明确的情绪不稳定和激活的积极情绪结构。一般因素与人格和精神病理学之间表现出相对非特异性的关联模式。相比之下,情绪不稳定因素与神经质和抑郁症状的关系最强,与外向性和积极情绪性的测量结果的关系较弱。相反,尽管激活的积极情绪在某些情况下也与抑郁症状和神经质呈正相关,但它与外向性和高唤醒积极情绪性的测量结果的关系最强。这些发现表明,定义情绪不稳定的措施似乎在更大程度上评估情绪波动,而定义激活的积极情绪因素的措施则捕捉到强烈的、高唤醒的积极情绪。