Valappil Fysal Kollanta, Rajan Ramesh, Natesh Bonny, Sindhu R S, Raviram S, Mathew Jacob
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, 695 011, India.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2016 May;35(3):225-8. doi: 10.1007/s12664-016-0667-7. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
Gold described a nomogram for prediction of recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). This retrospective study was intended to evaluate the utility of this nomogram for predicting a 2-year RFS in our patients. Twenty-eight consecutive eligible patients from January 2009 to January 2013 who underwent R0 resection and had histopathologically proven GIST were included in the study. Nomogram predicted RFS was compared with observed RFS in four groups as in the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-Fletcher classification. Calibration was assessed by plotting the predicted probabilities of RFS against the actual outcome. For validation of the nomogram, the graph obtained should be closer to the 45-degree line. The observed overall 2-year RFS was 85.7 % (24 patients). Four patients had recurrence within 2 years. The observed RFS was 87.5 %, 77.8 %, 90 %, and 100 % in the high, intermediate, low, and very low risk groups, respectively. The nomogram predicted the 2-year RFS was 40 %, 84.8 %, 88.6 %, and 90 % for high, intermediate, low, and very low risk groups, respectively. Thus, the predicted probabilities of the 2-year RFS in intermediate, low, and very low risk groups were similar to the observed outcomes. However, for the high risk group, the observed RFS was better than predicted RFS. This variation in the high risk group may be due to the use of adjuvant imatinib in our study.
戈尔德描述了一种用于预测胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)手术后无复发生存期(RFS)的列线图。这项回顾性研究旨在评估该列线图在预测我们患者2年RFS方面的实用性。研究纳入了2009年1月至2013年1月期间连续28例符合条件、接受了R0切除且组织病理学证实为GIST的患者。按照美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)-弗莱彻分类法,将列线图预测的RFS与四组中观察到的RFS进行比较。通过绘制RFS的预测概率与实际结果来评估校准情况。为验证列线图,得到的图形应更接近45度线。观察到的总体2年RFS为85.7%(24例患者)。4例患者在2年内复发。高、中、低和极低风险组观察到的RFS分别为87.5%、77.8%、90%和100%。列线图预测高、中、低和极低风险组的2年RFS分别为40%、84.8%、88.6%和90%。因此,中、低和极低风险组2年RFS的预测概率与观察结果相似。然而,对于高风险组,观察到的RFS优于预测的RFS。高风险组的这种差异可能是由于我们的研究中使用了辅助伊马替尼。