Lai Hung-Wen, Chen Chih-Jung, Lin Ying-Jen, Chen Shu-Ling, Wu Hwa-Koon, Wu Yu-Ting, Kuo Shou-Jen, Chen Shou-Tung, Chen Dar-Ren
From the Endoscopic & Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Center (H-WL, S-LC, S-TC, D-RC), Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center (H-WL, S-LC, S-JK, S-TC, D-RC), Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery (H-WL, S-JK, S-TC, D-RC), Department of Surgical Pathology (C-JC), Tumor Center (Y-JL), Department of Radiology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua (H-KW), School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei (H-WL), School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung (C-JC), Department of Medical Technology, Jen-Teh Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Miaoli (C-JC), and Department of Surgery, Ministry of Healthy and Welfare Sinying Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan (Y-TW).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(22):e3810. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003810.
The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with conventional breast imaging techniques decreases the rates of margin involvement and reexcision.Data on patients who underwent surgery for primary operable breast cancer were obtained from the Changhua Christian Hospital (CCH) breast cancer database. The rate of surgical margin involvement and the rate of reoperation were compared between patients who underwent conventional breast imaging modalities (Group A: mammography and sonography) and those who received breast MRI in addition to conventional imaging (Group B: mammography, sonography, and MRI).A total of 1468 patients were enrolled in this study. Among the 733 patients in Group A, 377 (51.4%) received breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 356 (48.6%) received mastectomy. Among the 735 patients in Group B, 348 (47.3%) received BCS and 387 (52.7%) received mastectomy. There were no significant differences in operative method between patients who received conventional imaging alone and those that received MRI and conventional imaging (P = 0.13). The rate of detection of pathological multifocal/multicentric breast cancer was markedly higher in patients who received preoperative MRI than in those who underwent conventional imaging alone (14.3% vs 8.6%, P < 0.01). The overall rate of surgical margin involvement was significantly lower in patients who received MRI (5.0%) than in those who received conventional imaging alone (9.0%) (P < 0.01). However, a significant reduction in rate of surgical margin positivity was only observed in patients who received BCS (Group A, 14.6%; Group B, 6.6%, P < 0.01). The overall BCS reoperation rates were 11.7% in the conventional imaging group and 3.2% in the combined MRI group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in rate of residual cancer in specimens obtained during reoperation between the 2 preoperative imaging groups (Group A, 50%; Group B, 81.8%, P = 0.09). In multivariate analysis, multifocal/multicentric breast cancer (odds ratio = 2.38, P = 0.02) and without MRI use (odds ratio = 2.35, P < 0.01) were the major predisposing factors to margin involvement in patients received BCS.Preoperative breast MRI combined with conventional breast imaging results in a lower rate of surgical margin involvement and reoperations in patients who receive BCS.
本研究的目的是评估术前乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)联合传统乳腺成像技术是否能降低切缘受累率和再次切除率。从彰化基督教医院(CCH)乳腺癌数据库中获取接受原发性可手术乳腺癌手术患者的数据。比较接受传统乳腺成像方式(A组:乳腺X线摄影和超声检查)的患者与除传统成像外还接受乳腺MRI检查(B组:乳腺X线摄影、超声检查和MRI)的患者的手术切缘受累率和再次手术率。
本研究共纳入1468例患者。A组733例患者中,377例(51.4%)接受保乳手术(BCS),356例(48.6%)接受乳房切除术。B组735例患者中,348例(47.3%)接受BCS,387例(52.7%)接受乳房切除术。单纯接受传统成像的患者与接受MRI及传统成像的患者在手术方式上无显著差异(P = 0.13)。接受术前MRI检查的患者病理多灶性/多中心性乳腺癌的检出率明显高于单纯接受传统成像的患者(14.3%对8.6%,P < 0.01)。接受MRI检查的患者手术切缘受累的总体发生率(5.0%)显著低于单纯接受传统成像的患者(9.0%)(P < 0.01)。然而,仅在接受BCS的患者中观察到手术切缘阳性率显著降低(A组,14.6%;B组,6.6%,P < 0.01)。传统成像组的总体BCS再次手术率为11.7%,MRI联合组为3.2%(P < 0.01)。两个术前成像组再次手术时获得的标本中残留癌的发生率无显著差异(A组,50%;B组,81.8%,P = 0.09)。在多变量分析中,多灶性/多中心性乳腺癌(比值比 = 2.38,P = 0.02)和未使用MRI(比值比 = 2.35,P <