Khalifa Jonathan, Duprez-Paumier Raphaelle, Filleron Thomas, Lacroix Triki Magali, Jouve Eva, Dalenc Florence, Massabeau Carole
Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud / Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopôle, Toulouse, Cedex, France.
Department of Pathology, Institut Claudius Regaud / Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopôle, Toulouse, Cedex, France.
Breast J. 2016 Sep;22(5):510-9. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12626. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
The optimal management of patients with pathologically node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (pN0 TNBC) remains unclear. We hypothesized that lymph node irradiation (LNI; internal mammary chain/periclavicular irradiation) had an impact on outcomes of pN0 TNBC. A cohort of 126 consecutive patients with pN0 TNBC treated between 2007 and 2010 at a single institute were included. All radiotherapy (breast/chest wall, ±LNI) was delivered adjuvantly, following completion of surgery ± chemotherapy. Tumors were reviewed and histologic features were described. Tissue microarrays were constructed and tumors were assessed by immunohistochemistry using antibodies against ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, cytokeratins 5/6, 14, epidermal growth factor receptor and androgen receptor. Patients were divided into two groups for statistical analysis: LNI (LNI+) or no LNI (LNI-). We focused on disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Fifty-seven and 69 patients received or not LNI, respectively. Median age was 52 (range [25-76]) and 55 (range [29-79]) in LNI+ and LNI- group (p = 0.23). LNI was associated with larger tumors (p = 0.033), central/internal tumors (33 versus 4, p < 0.01) and more chemotherapy (86% versus 59.4% p < 0.01). The median follow-up was 53.5 months. The rate of first regional relapse (associated or not with distant relapse) was low in both groups. There was no difference in 4-year DFS (82.2% versus 89.9%; p = 0.266), MFS (87.0% versus 91.1%; p = 0.286) and OS (85.8% versus 89.9%; p = 0.322) between LNI+ and LNI- group, respectively. In univariate analysis, only clinical size (T >10 mm versus ≤10 mm), histologic size (pT >10 mm versus ≤10 mm) and grade 3 (versus grade 2) were found to be significantly associated with shorter DFS. Omission of LNI in patients with pN0 TNBC does not seem to result in poorer outcome. Further studies are needed to specifically evaluate LNI in pN0 TNBC with histologic grade 3 and/or (p)T >10 mm.
病理淋巴结阴性三阴性乳腺癌(pN0 TNBC)患者的最佳管理方案仍不明确。我们推测淋巴结照射(LNI;内乳链/锁骨上照射)对pN0 TNBC的预后有影响。纳入了2007年至2010年在一家机构连续治疗的126例pN0 TNBC患者队列。所有放疗(乳房/胸壁,±LNI)均在手术±化疗完成后辅助进行。对肿瘤进行了复查并描述了组织学特征。构建了组织微阵列,并使用抗雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)、Ki-67、细胞角蛋白5/6、14、表皮生长因子受体和雄激素受体的抗体通过免疫组织化学对肿瘤进行评估。患者分为两组进行统计分析:LNI组(LNI+)或无LNI组(LNI-)。我们重点关注无病生存期(DFS)、无转移生存期(MFS)和总生存期(OS)。分别有57例和69例患者接受或未接受LNI。LNI+组和LNI-组的中位年龄分别为52岁(范围[25 - 76岁])和55岁(范围[29 - 79岁])(p = 0.23)。LNI与更大的肿瘤(p = 0.033)、中央/内部肿瘤(33例对4例,p < 0.01)以及更多的化疗(86%对59.4%,p < 0.01)相关。中位随访时间为53.5个月。两组首次区域复发(无论是否伴有远处复发)的发生率都较低。LNI+组和LNI-组的4年DFS(82.2%对89.9%;p = 0.266)、MFS(87.0%对91.1%;p = 0.286)和OS(85.8%对89.9%;p = 0.322)之间分别无差异。在单因素分析中,仅发现临床大小(T >10 mm对≤10 mm)、组织学大小(pT >10 mm对≤10 mm)和3级(对2级)与较短的DFS显著相关。pN0 TNBC患者省略LNI似乎不会导致更差的预后。需要进一步研究以专门评估组织学3级和/或(p)T >10 mm的pN0 TNBC患者的LNI情况。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010-2-18
Breast J. 2019-5-12