Fisher Beth E, Piraino Andrew, Lee Ya-Yun, Smith Jo Armour, Johnson Sean, Davenport Todd E, Kulig Kornelia
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;46(7):562-70. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6602. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Background Joint mobilization and manipulation decrease pain and improve patient function. Yet, the processes underlying these changes are not well understood. Measures of corticospinal excitability provide insight into potential mechanisms mediated by the central nervous system. Objectives To investigate the differential effects of joint mobilization and manipulation at the talocrural joint on corticospinal excitability in individuals with resolved symptoms following ankle sprain. Methods Twenty-seven participants with a history of ankle sprain were randomly assigned to the control, joint mobilization, or thrust manipulation group. The motor-evoked potential (MEP) and cortical silent period (CSP) of the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius were obtained with transcranial magnetic stimulation at rest and during active contraction of the tibialis anterior. The slopes of MEP/CSP input/output curves and the maximal MEP/CSP values were calculated to indicate corticospinal excitability. Behavioral measures, including ankle dorsiflexion and dynamic balance, were evaluated. Results A repeated-measures analysis of variance of the MEP slope showed a significant group-by-time interaction for the tibialis anterior at rest (P = .002) and during active contraction (P = .042). After intervention, the thrust manipulation group had an increase in corticospinal excitability, while the corticospinal excitability decreased in the mobilization group. The thrust manipulation group, but not other groups, also demonstrated a significant increase in the maximal MEP amplitude of the tibialis anterior after intervention. Conclusion The findings suggest that joint manipulation and mobilization have different effects on corticospinal excitability. The increased corticospinal excitability following thrust manipulation may provide a window for physical therapists to optimize muscle recruitment and subsequently movement. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00847769). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(7):562-570. Epub 6 Jun 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6602.
对照实验室研究。背景:关节松动术和整复手法可减轻疼痛并改善患者功能。然而,这些变化背后的机制尚未完全明确。皮质脊髓兴奋性测量有助于深入了解由中枢神经系统介导的潜在机制。目的:探讨踝关节扭伤症状已缓解的个体中,距小腿关节的关节松动术和整复手法对皮质脊髓兴奋性的不同影响。方法:27名有踝关节扭伤病史的参与者被随机分配到对照组、关节松动术组或手法整复组。在静息状态和胫骨前肌主动收缩时,通过经颅磁刺激获取胫骨前肌和腓肠肌的运动诱发电位(MEP)和皮质静息期(CSP)。计算MEP/CSP输入/输出曲线的斜率和最大MEP/CSP值以指示皮质脊髓兴奋性。评估包括踝关节背屈和动态平衡在内的行为指标。结果:对MEP斜率进行重复测量方差分析显示,静息时(P = .002)和主动收缩时(P = .042)胫骨前肌存在显著的组×时间交互作用。干预后,手法整复组的皮质脊髓兴奋性增加,而松动术组的皮质脊髓兴奋性降低。手法整复组在干预后胫骨前肌的最大MEP波幅也显著增加,而其他组未出现此情况。结论:研究结果表明,关节整复手法和松动术对皮质脊髓兴奋性有不同影响。手法整复后皮质脊髓兴奋性增加可能为物理治疗师优化肌肉募集及随后的运动提供一个窗口。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT00847769)。《矫形与运动物理治疗杂志》2016年;46(7):562 - 570。2016年6月6日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6602 。