Yost Gardner, Coyle Laura, Milkevitch Kristen, Adair Roy, Tatooles Antone, Bhat Geetha
Advocate Christ Medical Center, Center for Heart Transplant and Assist Devices, Heart and Vascular Institute Administration, Oak Lawn, IL(∗).
Advocate Christ Medical Center, Center for Heart Transplant and Assist Devices, Heart and Vascular Institute Administration, Oak Lawn, IL(†).
PM R. 2017 Jan;9(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become an increasingly popular and effective means for treating advanced heart failure. LVAD implantation requires extensive surgery and postoperative rehabilitation. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) has been used to quantify functional gains in numerous patient populations, including those with stroke and spinal cord injury. This study investigated functional improvements in patients undergoing LVAD implantation using the FIM score.
To assess functional improvements in patients with advanced heart failure who underwent LVAD implantation.
Retrospective.
Inpatient rehabilitation unit.
Ninety consecutive patients who received acute inpatient rehabilitation after continuous flow LVAD implantation.
Demographic, laboratory, and functional outcomes data including inpatient rehabilitation unit (IRU) length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and FIM score were collected for all patients. Paired t-tests were used to assess change in functional measures and laboratory data.
Primary outcome measures included FIM gain, FIM efficiency, discharge disposition, rates of readmission after discharge from rehabilitation, and LOS in the rehabilitation unit.
The FIM gain was statistically significant at 28.4 ± 12.3 (P < .001) and compared favorably with benchmarks for mean FIM gains at our facility (26.4), regionally (21.5), and nationally (22.7) for patients admitted to IRUs with a cardiac diagnosis. FIM efficiency (FIM gain/IRU LOS) was 1.9 ± 1.0 compared with the mean FIM efficiency at our facility (2.2), regionally (2.1), and nationally (2.2). Seventy-four percent (n = 67) of patients were discharged directly home after inpatient rehabilitation, 17% (n = 16) were readmitted to the acute hospital service, and 8% (n = 7) required additional rehabilitation at a subacute rehabilitation facility. The IRU LOS was 16.2 ± 6.9 days.
Our study indicates that most patients with an LVAD achieve clinically meaningful functional gains from acute inpatient rehabilitation, with the majority of patients being discharged home. Further studies need to be performed to analyze clinical outcomes after acute inpatient rehabilitation.
IV.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)已成为治疗晚期心力衰竭越来越常用且有效的手段。LVAD植入需要进行广泛的手术及术后康复。功能独立性评定量表(FIM)已被用于量化众多患者群体(包括中风和脊髓损伤患者)的功能改善情况。本研究使用FIM评分调查接受LVAD植入患者的功能改善情况。
评估接受LVAD植入的晚期心力衰竭患者的功能改善情况。
回顾性研究。
住院康复科。
90例连续接受持续血流LVAD植入术后进行急性住院康复的患者。
收集所有患者的人口统计学、实验室及功能结局数据,包括住院康复科(IRU)住院时间(LOS)、出院处置方式及FIM评分。采用配对t检验评估功能指标及实验室数据的变化。
主要结局指标包括FIM改善值、FIM效率、出院处置方式、康复出院后再入院率及康复科住院时间。
FIM改善值在统计学上具有显著意义,为28.4±12.3(P<.001),与我院(26.4)、本地区(21.5)及全国(22.7)因心脏疾病入住IRU患者的平均FIM改善值基准相比更优。FIM效率(FIM改善值/IRU住院时间)为1.9±1.0,与我院(2.2)、本地区(2.1)及全国(2.2)的平均FIM效率相比。74%(n=67)的患者在住院康复后直接出院回家,17%(n=16)再次入住急症医院,8%(n=7)需要在亚急性康复机构接受进一步康复治疗。IRU住院时间为16.2±6.9天。
我们的研究表明,大多数LVAD患者通过急性住院康复获得了具有临床意义的功能改善,大多数患者出院回家。需要进一步开展研究以分析急性住院康复后的临床结局。
IV级。