Suppr超能文献

高强度局部治疗转移性膀胱癌的疗效:来自国家癌症数据库的倾向评分加权分析。

Efficacy of High-Intensity Local Treatment for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis From the National Cancer Data Base.

机构信息

Thomas Seisen, Maxine Sun, Jeffrey J. Leow, Mark A. Preston, Alexander P. Cole, Francisco Gelpi-Hammerschmidt, Nawar Hanna, Christian P. Meyer, Adam S. Kibel, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Paul L. Nguyen, and Quoc-Dien Trinh, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 10;34(29):3529-3536. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7352.

Abstract

Purpose Evidence from studies of other malignancies has indicated that aggressive local treatment (LT), even in the presence of metastatic disease, is beneficial. Against a backdrop of stagnant mortality rates for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUCB) at presentation, we hypothesized that high-intensity LT of primary tumor burden, defined as the receipt of radical cystectomy or ≥ 50 Gy of radiation therapy delivered to the bladder, affects overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods We identified 3,753 patients within the National Cancer Data Base who received multiagent systemic chemotherapy combined with high-intensity versus conservative LT for primary mUCB. Patients who received no LT, transurethral resection of the bladder tumor alone, or < 50 Gy of radiation therapy delivered to the bladder were included in the conservative LT group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) -adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were used to compare OS of patients who received high-intensity versus conservative LT. Results Overall, 297 (7.91%) and 3,456 (92.09%) patients with mUCB received high-intensity and conservative LT, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median OS was significantly longer in the high-intensity LT group than in the conservative LT group (14.92 [interquartile range, 9.82 to 30.72] v 9.95 [interquartile range, 5.29 to 17.08] months, respectively; P < .001). Furthermore, in IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, high-intensity LT was associated with a significant OS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.65; P < .001). Conclusion We report an OS benefit for individuals with mUCB treated with high-intensity versus conservative LT. Although the findings are subject to the usual biases related to the observational study design, these preliminary data warrant further consideration in randomized controlled trials, particularly given the poor prognosis associated with mUCB.

摘要

目的

其他恶性肿瘤研究的证据表明,即使存在转移性疾病,积极的局部治疗(LT)也是有益的。在膀胱癌转移性(mUCB)患者的死亡率停滞不前的背景下,我们假设原发肿瘤负荷的高强度 LT,定义为接受根治性膀胱切除术或膀胱接受≥50Gy 的放射治疗,会影响总生存期(OS)。

方法

我们在国家癌症数据库中确定了 3753 名接受多药联合系统化疗联合高强度与保守性 LT 治疗原发性 mUCB 的患者。接受无 LT、单纯经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术或膀胱接受<50Gy 放射治疗的患者被纳入保守性 LT 组。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)调整的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 回归分析比较接受高强度与保守性 LT 的患者的 OS。

结果

总体而言,297(7.91%)和 3456(92.09%)例 mUCB 患者分别接受高强度和保守性 LT。IPTW 调整的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,高强度 LT 组的中位 OS 明显长于保守性 LT 组(14.92[四分位距,9.82 至 30.72]与 9.95[四分位距,5.29 至 17.08]个月;P<0.001)。此外,在 IPTW 调整的 Cox 回归分析中,高强度 LT 与显著的 OS 获益相关(风险比,0.56;95%CI,0.48 至 0.65;P<0.001)。

结论

我们报告了高强度与保守性 LT 治疗 mUCB 患者的 OS 获益。尽管这些发现受到观察性研究设计中常见偏倚的影响,但这些初步数据值得在随机对照试验中进一步考虑,特别是考虑到 mUCB 相关的预后较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验