Ezard Thomas H G, Purvis Andy
Ocean and Earth Sciences, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK.
Centre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Life Sciences Building 85, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Ecol Lett. 2016 Aug;19(8):899-906. doi: 10.1111/ele.12626. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
Co-dependent geological and climatic changes obscure how species interact in deep time. The interplay between these environmental factors makes it hard to discern whether ecological competition exerts an upper limit on species richness. Here, using the exceptional fossil record of Cenozoic Era macroperforate planktonic foraminifera, we assess the evidence for alternative modes of macroevolutionary competition. Our models support an environmentally dependent macroevolutionary form of contest competition that yields finite upper bounds on species richness. Models of biotic competition assuming unchanging environmental conditions were overwhelmingly rejected. In the best-supported model, temperature affects the per-lineage diversification rate, while both temperature and an environmental driver of sediment accumulation defines the upper limit. The support for contest competition implies that incumbency constrains species richness by restricting niche availability, and that the number of macroevolutionary niches varies as a function of environmental changes.
相互依存的地质和气候变化模糊了物种在漫长时间里的相互作用方式。这些环境因素之间的相互作用使得难以辨别生态竞争是否对物种丰富度施加了上限。在此,利用新生代有大穿孔的浮游有孔虫的特殊化石记录,我们评估了宏观进化竞争替代模式的证据。我们的模型支持一种环境依赖型的竞争竞争宏观进化形式,这种形式对物种丰富度产生有限的上限。假设环境条件不变的生物竞争模型被大量否定。在得到最佳支持的模型中,温度影响每个谱系的多样化速率,而温度和沉积物堆积的一个环境驱动因素共同确定了上限。对竞争竞争的支持意味着在位优势通过限制生态位可用性来限制物种丰富度,并且宏观进化生态位的数量随环境变化而变化。