Perspectives of Prostate Cancer Patients on Gleason Scores and the New Grade Groups: Initial Qualitative Study.
作者信息
Loeb Stacy, Curnyn Caitlin, Sedlander Erica
机构信息
Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Population Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Population Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
出版信息
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1083-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.039. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Perspectives of Prostate Cancer Patients on Gleason Scores and the New Grade Groups: Initial Qualitative Study.
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1083-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.039. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
2
Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820.
3
The Role of Tumor Oxygenation Tested by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Prostate Cancer Grading.
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Apr 5;25:2505-2510. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913110.
4
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
Recent advances in prostate cancer pathology: Gleason grading and beyond.
Pathol Int. 2016 May;66(5):260-72. doi: 10.1111/pin.12398. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
6
Contemporary Gleason grading and novel Grade Groups in clinical practice.
Curr Opin Urol. 2016 Sep;26(5):488-92. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000320.
7
Gleason Grading, Biochemical Failure, and Prostate Cancer-Specific Death.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2017 Mar 1;147(3):273-277. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw212.
8
Correlation of modified Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma with age, serum prostate specific antigen and tumor extent in needle biopsy specimens.
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2008 Jun;30(3):133-8.
9
Performance of Prostate Health Index in Biopsy Naïve Black Men.
J Urol. 2021 Mar;205(3):718-724. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001453. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):592-598. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.029. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
引用本文的文献
1
The influence of the "cancer" label on perceptions and management decisions for low-grade prostate cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Nov 8;115(11):1364-1373. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad108.
2
It's all in the name: Does nomenclature for indolent prostate cancer impact management and anxiety?
Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3354-3360. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33621. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
3
Informational needs during active surveillance for prostate cancer: A qualitative study.
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):241-247. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Oncology (Williston Park). 2017 Jan 15;31(1):67-70.
5
Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Jun;20(2):197-202. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.66. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
6
Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;114(6):664-670. doi: 10.1002/jso.24408. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
本文引用的文献
1
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
2
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
3
Future-proofing Gleason Grading: What to Call Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer?
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.038. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
4
Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):753-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
5
Classification of prostatic carcinomas.
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):125-8.
Zotero 插件