• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is distance to chemotherapy an obstacle to adjuvant care among the N.C. Medicaid-enrolled colon cancer patients?对于北卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划覆盖的结肠癌患者而言,距离化疗地点的远近是否会成为辅助治疗的障碍?
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(3):336-44. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.02.01.
2
Effects of distance to care and rural or urban residence on receipt of radiation therapy among North Carolina Medicare enrollees with breast cancer.北卡罗来纳州患有乳腺癌的医疗保险参保者中,就医距离和城乡居住情况对接受放射治疗的影响。
N C Med J. 2014 Jul-Aug;75(4):239-46. doi: 10.18043/ncm.75.4.239.
3
Adjuvant chemotherapy among medicaid-enrolled patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon cancer.医疗保险参保患者诊断为非转移性结肠癌的辅助化疗。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr;34(2):120-4. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181d2ed93.
4
Evaluating the urban-rural paradox: The complicated relationship between distance and the receipt of guideline-concordant care among cervical cancer patients.评估城乡悖论:距离与宫颈癌患者接受规范治疗之间的复杂关系。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jan;152(1):112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
5
Association Between Geographic Access to Cancer Care, Insurance, and Receipt of Chemotherapy: Geographic Distribution of Oncologists and Travel Distance.获得癌症治疗的地理便利性、保险与化疗接受情况之间的关联:肿瘤学家的地理分布与出行距离
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3177-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1558. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Examining Urban and Rural Differences in How Distance to Care Influences the Initiation and Completion of Treatment among Insured Cervical Cancer Patients.检查距离医疗照顾的远近如何影响参保宫颈癌患者治疗的开始和完成方面的城乡差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 May;28(5):882-889. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0945. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
7
The association of travel burden with prenatal care utilization, what happens after provider-selection.旅行负担与产前保健利用的关联:在选择提供者之后会发生什么。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11249-9.
8
Distance Matters: Investigating No-Shows in a Large Rural Provider Network.距离很重要:调查大型农村医疗服务提供商网络中的爽约情况。
Clin Med Res. 2023 Dec;21(4):177-191. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2023.1853.
9
Distance to Radiation Facility and Treatment Choice in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌患者到放疗机构的距离与治疗选择
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 15;94(4):691-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.020. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
The relationship of travel distance with cystectomy access and outcomes.旅行距离与膀胱切除术入路及结果的关系。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;36(6):308.e1-308.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Overcoming Geographic Barriers: Surgical Care in Rural Populations.克服地理障碍:农村人口的外科护理
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 Apr 25;38(1):41-48. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786390. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Choreographed expansion of services results in decreased patient burden without compromise of outcomes: An assessment of the Ontario experience.精心规划的服务扩展在不影响治疗效果的情况下减轻了患者负担:对安大略省经验的评估。
Neurooncol Pract. 2023 Dec 14;11(2):178-187. doi: 10.1093/nop/npad076. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Real-life experiences and barriers to adjuvant chemotherapy in Saudi patients with advanced stage II and stage III colon cancer.沙特晚期 II 期和 III 期结肠癌患者辅助化疗的实际经验和障碍。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;30(2):114-122. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_261_23. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
4
Rural versus urban commuting patients with stage III colon cancer: is there a difference in treatment and outcome?III期结肠癌的农村与城市通勤患者:治疗和结局是否存在差异?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9441-9452. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10406-1. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Correlation between Quality of Life under Treatment and Current Life Satisfaction among Cancer Survivors Aged 75 Years and Older Receiving Outpatient Chemotherapy in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan.日本石川县75岁及以上接受门诊化疗的癌症幸存者治疗期间生活质量与当前生活满意度的相关性
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 24;10(10):1863. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101863.
6
The impact of patient travel time on disparities in treatment for early stage lung cancer in California.患者交通时间对加利福尼亚州早期肺癌治疗差异的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0272076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272076. eCollection 2022.
7
Living in Rural Areas and Receiving Cancer Treatment Away From Home: A Qualitative Study Foregrounding Temporality.生活在农村地区且离家接受癌症治疗:一项以时间性为重点的定性研究
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2022 Jul 20;9:23333936221111802. doi: 10.1177/23333936221111802. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Travel distance is associated with stage at presentation and laryngectomy rates among patients with laryngeal cancer.旅行距离与喉癌患者就诊时的分期和喉切除术率相关。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;124(8):1272-1283. doi: 10.1002/jso.26643. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
9
Transportation as a barrier to colorectal cancer care.交通作为结直肠癌护理的一个障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06339-x.
10
Are Waterpipe Café, Vape Shop, and Traditional Tobacco Retailer Locations Associated with Community Composition and Young Adult Tobacco Use in North Carolina and Virginia?水烟咖啡馆、电子烟商店和传统烟草零售商的地点与北卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州的社区构成和青年烟草使用有关吗?
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(14):2395-2402. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1823417. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Blood-based tests for colorectal cancer screening: do they threaten the survival of the FIT test?用于结直肠癌筛查的血液检测:它们会威胁粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的生存吗?
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Mar;60(3):664-71. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3575-2. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
2
Is distance to provider a barrier to care for medicaid patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer?距离医疗机构的远近是否会成为医疗补助计划中患有乳腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌的患者获得治疗的障碍?
J Rural Health. 2012 Jan;28(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00371.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
3
Adjuvant chemotherapy among medicaid-enrolled patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon cancer.医疗保险参保患者诊断为非转移性结肠癌的辅助化疗。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr;34(2):120-4. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181d2ed93.
4
Characteristics of patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma who fail to receive guideline-recommended treatment.III 期结肠癌患者未能接受指南推荐治疗的特征。
Cancer. 2010 Oct 15;116(20):4849-56. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25250.
5
Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcome.社会经济地位与结直肠癌的变化不平等?对风险、治疗和结局关联的综述。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Oct;46(15):2681-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
6
Does distance matter? Distance to mammography facilities and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Kentucky.距离重要吗?肯塔基州乳腺癌诊断时与乳房X光检查设施的距离及分期情况
J Rural Health. 2009 Fall;25(4):366-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00245.x.
7
Dually eligible and colorectal cancer screening: too little, too late?双重资格与结直肠癌筛查:做得太少,为时已晚?
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 Aug;20(3):854-65. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0172.
8
Rates and predictors of chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer: a systematic review.III期结肠癌化疗的使用比率及预测因素:一项系统综述
Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12):3279-89. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23958.
9
Pecuniary compensation increases participation in screening for colorectal cancer.经济补偿会提高对结直肠癌筛查的参与度。
Health Econ. 2009 Mar;18(3):337-54. doi: 10.1002/hec.1371.
10
Travel time to hospital and treatment for breast, colon, rectum, lung, ovary and prostate cancer.前往医院的时间以及乳腺癌、结肠癌、直肠癌、肺癌、卵巢癌和前列腺癌的治疗
Eur J Cancer. 2008 May;44(7):992-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

对于北卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划覆盖的结肠癌患者而言,距离化疗地点的远近是否会成为辅助治疗的障碍?

Is distance to chemotherapy an obstacle to adjuvant care among the N.C. Medicaid-enrolled colon cancer patients?

作者信息

Sparling Alica S, Song Eunyoung, Klepin Heidi D, Foley Kristie L

机构信息

1 Department of Economics, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035, USA ; 2 Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA ; 3 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA ; 4 Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(3):336-44. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.02.01.

DOI:10.21037/jgo.2016.02.01
PMID:27284464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4880786/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer has been linked to patient and provider characteristics but little is known about whether distance to chemotherapy providers constitutes an obstacle to chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 1,184 Medicaid patients diagnosed with colon cancer in North Carolina in 1999-2002 comprised the sample. Data from the N.C. Central Cancer Registry, N.C. Medicaid Claims, American Hospital Directory and US Census were merged. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between chemotherapy receipt and the distance to nearest chemotherapy provider.

RESULTS

Compared to the referent group of SEER-staged II (local) cancer patients living less than 2 miles from the nearest chemotherapy provider, the odds of receiving chemotherapy fell as the distance to the nearest provider increased. The odds ratio (OR) for those living ≥5 to <15 miles away was 0.13 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.04-0.39], and OR for those living ≥15 miles away was 0.06 (95% CI, 0.01-0.52). Patients diagnosed with regional, SEER-staged III (regional) cancer were less likely to receive chemotherapy if they lived in rural areas more than 20 miles away from the nearest provider (OR =0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.72). However, we found no evidence of association between chemotherapy receipt and distance to the nearest provider for regional cancer patients living in urban areas and those living in rural areas within 20 miles from the nearest chemotherapy provider.

CONCLUSIONS

Distance to provider may be an obstacle to chemotherapy for some groups of low-income colon cancer patients. Relieving travel burdens of rural patients living far from providers may help Medicaid increase guideline-consistent adjuvant care for regional cancer patients.

摘要

背景

结肠癌辅助化疗与患者及医疗服务提供者的特征有关,但距离化疗服务提供者的远近是否会成为化疗的障碍,目前所知甚少。

方法

样本包括1999 - 2002年在北卡罗来纳州被诊断为结肠癌的1184名医疗补助患者。合并了北卡罗来纳州中央癌症登记处、北卡罗来纳州医疗补助索赔、美国医院名录和美国人口普查的数据。采用逻辑回归模型来估计接受化疗与距离最近化疗服务提供者的距离之间的关联。

结果

与居住在距离最近化疗服务提供者不到2英里的SEER分期II期(局部)癌症患者的参照组相比,接受化疗的几率随着距离最近服务提供者的距离增加而降低。居住在≥5至<15英里外的患者的比值比(OR)为0.13[95%置信区间(CI),0.04 - 0.39],居住在≥15英里外的患者的OR为0.06(95%CI,0.01 - 0.52)。被诊断为区域性、SEER分期III期(区域性)癌症的患者,如果居住在距离最近服务提供者超过20英里的农村地区,则接受化疗的可能性较小(OR = 0.08;95%CI,0.01 - 0.72)。然而,对于居住在城市地区的区域性癌症患者以及居住在距离最近化疗服务提供者20英里以内农村地区的患者,我们没有发现接受化疗与距离最近服务提供者的距离之间存在关联的证据。

结论

对于某些低收入结肠癌患者群体,距离服务提供者的远近可能是化疗的障碍。减轻居住在远离服务提供者地区的农村患者的出行负担,可能有助于医疗补助计划增加对区域性癌症患者符合指南的辅助治疗。