Maschke Karen J, Gusmano Michael K
a Research Scholar , The Hastings Center , Garrison , New York , USA.
b Associate Professor of Health Policy , Rutgers University , New Brunswick , New Jersey , USA.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2017 Mar-Apr;29(2):105-122. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2016.1198970. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
We examine a recent dispute regarding the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) refusal to unconditionally pay for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for Medicare beneficiaries being assessed for Alzheimer's disease. CMS will only pay for amyloid PET imaging when patients are enrolled in clinical trials that meet certain criteria. The dispute reflects CMS's willingness in certain circumstances to require effectiveness evidence that differs from the Food and Drug Administration's standard for pre-market approval of a medical intervention and reveals how stakeholders with differing perspectives about evidentiary standards have played a role in attempting to shape the Medicare program's coverage policies.
我们审视了近期一场有关医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)拒绝无条件为接受阿尔茨海默病评估的医疗保险受益人支付淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像费用的争议。只有当患者参加符合某些标准的临床试验时,CMS才会支付淀粉样蛋白PET成像费用。这场争议反映出CMS在某些情况下愿意要求有不同于美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)医疗干预上市前批准标准的有效性证据,还揭示了对证据标准持有不同观点的利益相关方在试图塑造医疗保险计划覆盖政策方面所起的作用。