Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2016 Aug 30;254:3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Among people at genetic risk of schizophrenia, those who use cannabis show smaller thalamic and hippocampal volumes. We evaluated this relationship in people at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis. The Alcohol and Drug Use Scale was used to identify 132 CHR cannabis users, the majority of whom were non-dependent cannabis users, 387 CHR non-users, and 204 healthy control non-users, and all participants completed magnetic resonance imaging scans. Volumes of the thalamus, hippocampus and amygdala were extracted with FreeSurfer, and compared across groups. Comparing all CHR participants with healthy control participants revealed no significant differences in volumes of any ROI. However, when comparing CHR users to CHR non-users, a significant ROI×Cannabis group effect emerged: CHR users showed significantly smaller amygdala compared to CHR non-users. However, when limiting analysis to CHR subjects who reported using alcohol at a 'use without impairment' severity level, the amygdala effect was non-significant; rather, smaller hippocampal volumes were seen in CHR cannabis users compared to non-users. Controlling statistically for effects of alcohol and tobacco use rendered all results non-significant. These results highlight the importance of controlling for residual confounding effects of other substance use when examining the relationship between cannabis use and neural structure.
在有精神分裂症遗传风险的人群中,那些使用大麻的人表现出更小的丘脑和海马体体积。我们在有精神病临床高风险(CHR)的人群中评估了这种关系。使用酒精和药物使用量表来识别 132 名 CHR 大麻使用者,其中大多数是无依赖性大麻使用者,387 名 CHR 非使用者和 204 名健康对照组非使用者,所有参与者都完成了磁共振成像扫描。使用 FreeSurfer 提取丘脑、海马体和杏仁核的体积,并在各组之间进行比较。将所有 CHR 参与者与健康对照组参与者进行比较,发现任何 ROI 的体积均无显著差异。然而,当比较 CHR 使用者与 CHR 非使用者时,出现了显著的 ROI×大麻组效应:CHR 使用者的杏仁核明显小于 CHR 非使用者。然而,当将分析限制在报告使用酒精的 CHR 受试者中,严重程度为“使用无损害”时,杏仁核效应则不显著;相反,CHR 大麻使用者的海马体体积明显小于非使用者。对酒精和烟草使用的统计学控制使所有结果均不显著。这些结果强调了在研究大麻使用与神经结构之间的关系时,控制其他物质使用的残留混杂效应的重要性。