Rimbach Rebecca, Link Andrés, Heistermann Michael, Gómez-Posada Carolina, Galvis Nelson, Heymann Eckhard W
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; Fundación Proyecto Primates, Cra. 11a No. 91-55, Bogotá, Colombia.
Fundación Proyecto Primates, Cra. 11a No. 91-55, Bogotá, Colombia; Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Cra. 1 No. 18a-12, Bogotá, Colombia.
Conserv Physiol. 2013 Nov 21;1(1):cot031. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cot031. eCollection 2013.
Habitat fragmentation and anthropogenic disturbances are of major concern to the conservation of endangered species because of their potentially negative impact on animal populations. Both processes can impose physiological stress (i.e. increased glucocorticoid output) on animals, and chronically elevated stress levels can have detrimental effects on the long-term viability of animal populations. Here, we investigated the effect of fragment size and human impact (logging and hunting pressure) on glucocorticoid levels of two sympatric Neotropical primates, the red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus) and the critically endangered brown spider monkey (Ateles hybridus). These two species have been reported to contrast strongly in their ability to cope with anthropogenic disturbances. We collected faecal samples from eight spider monkey groups and 31 howler monkey groups, living in seven and 10 different forest fragments in Colombia, respectively. We measured faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGCM) levels in both species using previously validated methods. Surprisingly, fragment size did not influence FGCM levels in either species. Spider monkeys showed elevated FGCMs in fragments with the highest level of human impact, whereas we did not find this effect in howler monkeys. This suggests that the two species differ in their physiological responsiveness to anthropogenic changes, further emphasizing why brown spider monkeys are at higher extinction risk than red howler monkeys. If these anthropogenic disturbances persist in the long term, elevated FGCM levels can potentially lead to a state of chronic stress, which might limit the future viability of populations. We propose that FGCM measurements should be used as a tool to monitor populations living in disturbed areas and to assess the success of conservation strategies, such as corridors connecting forest fragments.
栖息地破碎化和人为干扰是濒危物种保护的主要关切问题,因为它们可能对动物种群产生负面影响。这两个过程都会给动物带来生理压力(即糖皮质激素分泌增加),长期升高的压力水平会对动物种群的长期生存能力产生不利影响。在此,我们研究了片段大小和人类影响(伐木和狩猎压力)对两种同域分布的新热带灵长类动物——红吼猴(Alouatta seniculus)和极度濒危的褐蜘蛛猴(Ateles hybridus)糖皮质激素水平的影响。据报道,这两个物种在应对人为干扰的能力上有很大差异。我们分别从生活在哥伦比亚7个和10个不同森林片段中的8个蜘蛛猴群体和31个吼猴群体收集粪便样本。我们使用先前验证过的方法测量了这两个物种粪便中糖皮质激素代谢物(FGCM)的水平。令人惊讶的是,片段大小对这两个物种的FGCM水平均无影响。蜘蛛猴在人类影响程度最高的片段中显示出较高的FGCM水平,而在吼猴中我们未发现这种影响。这表明这两个物种对人为变化的生理反应不同,进一步强调了为什么褐蜘蛛猴比红吼猴面临更高的灭绝风险。如果这些人为干扰长期持续,升高的FGCM水平可能会导致慢性应激状态,这可能会限制种群未来的生存能力。我们建议将FGCM测量用作监测生活在受干扰地区的种群以及评估保护策略(如连接森林片段的廊道)成效的工具。