以患者为中心的目标设定（C-COGS）量表在获得性脑损伤康复中的信度
Reliability of the Client-Centeredness of Goal Setting (C-COGS) Scale in Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation.
作者信息
Doig Emmah, Prescott Sarah, Fleming Jennifer, Cornwell Petrea, Kuipers Pim
机构信息
Emmah Doig, PhD, BOccThy Hons, is Research Fellow, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia Campus, Brisbane, Australia;
Sarah Prescott, BOccThy Hons, is PhD Candidate, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia Campus, Brisbane, Australia.
出版信息
Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Jul-Aug;70(4):7004290010. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.017046.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the internal reliability and test-retest reliability of the Client-Centeredness of Goal Setting (C-COGS) scale.
METHOD
The C-COGS scale was administered to 42 participants with acquired brain injury after completion of multidisciplinary goal planning. Internal reliability of scale items was examined using item-partial total correlations and Cronbach's α coefficient. The scale was readministered within a 1-mo period to a subsample of 12 participants to examine test-retest reliability by calculating exact and close percentage agreement for each item.
RESULTS
After examination of item-partial total correlations, test items were revised. The revised items demonstrated stronger internal consistency than the original items. Preliminary evaluation of test-retest reliability was fair, with an average exact percent agreement across all test items of 67%.
CONCLUSION
Findings support the preliminary reliability of the C-COGS scale as a tool to evaluate and promote client-centered goal planning in brain injury rehabilitation.
目的
检验以患者为中心的目标设定（C-COGS）量表的内部信度和重测信度。
方法
在多学科目标规划完成后，对42名获得性脑损伤患者施测C-COGS量表。使用项目-部分总分相关系数和克朗巴哈α系数检验量表项目的内部信度。在1个月内对12名参与者的子样本重新施测该量表，通过计算每个项目的确切和接近百分比一致性来检验重测信度。
结果
在检验项目-部分总分相关系数后，对测试项目进行了修订。修订后的项目显示出比原始项目更强的内部一致性。重测信度的初步评估结果尚可，所有测试项目的确切百分比一致性平均为67%。
结论
研究结果支持C-COGS量表作为评估和促进脑损伤康复中以患者为中心的目标规划工具的初步信度。
Zotero 插件