Tita Alan T N
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women׳s Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Semin Perinatol. 2016 Aug;40(5):287-90. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
The optimal timing of delivery in the setting of various clinical conditions and scenarios remains one of the most common questions for obstetric providers. Over the past 5-10 years, the optimal timing of delivery at term, particularly for elective repeat cesareans, has been the subject of considerable investigation and discussion. There is an increasing consensus that when women opt for an elective repeat cesarean delivery, it should be performed at term rather than preterm. The recent redefinition of the "term" period into early term (37-38 weeks), full-term (39-40 weeks), late term (41 weeks), and post term designations (≥42 weeks) underscores observed heterogeneity in outcomes following delivery at term. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommends that elective repeat cesarean delivery be performed at full-term. Herein, the available data to support this recommendation regarding timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery are reviewed, including contributions from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network.
在各种临床情况和场景下,最佳分娩时机仍然是产科医护人员最常遇到的问题之一。在过去5至10年里,足月分娩的最佳时机,尤其是选择性再次剖宫产的最佳时机,一直是大量研究和讨论的主题。越来越多的人达成共识,即当女性选择选择性再次剖宫产时,应在足月而非早产时进行。最近将“足月”期重新定义为早期足月(37 - 38周)、足月(39 - 40周)、晚期足月(41周)和过期妊娠(≥42周),这凸显了足月分娩后观察到的结局异质性。美国妇产科医师学会目前建议选择性再次剖宫产应在足月时进行。在此,我们回顾了支持这一关于选择性再次剖宫产时机建议的现有数据,包括尤妮斯·肯尼迪·施赖弗国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所(NICHD)母胎医学单位(MFMU)网络的贡献。