Burian Ronald, Franke Miriam, Diefenbacher Albert
Dept. of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Ev. Krankenhaus "Königin Elisabeth Herzberge", Herzbergstrasse 79, 10365 Berlin, Germany.
Dept. of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Ev. Krankenhaus "Königin Elisabeth Herzberge", Herzbergstrasse 79, 10365 Berlin, Germany.
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Jul;86:53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 13.
Concordance with consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatrists' recommendations by general practitioners (GP) has hardly been studied systematically. We studied if telephone calls or written notes from a hospital based CL-service to GPs, whose patients were treated on medical-surgical wards, can improve GP-concordance, as compared to the usual communication pathway by standard discharge letters written by hospital physicians, and if higher GP-concordance improves outcomes of depressive and anxious symptoms.
116 inpatients of a general hospital referred to a CL-service with depression and anxiety were allocated to three groups of communication pathways between CL-service and GPs: (1) A telephone call (TC) by CL-psychiatrists with GPs, (2) a copy of the psychiatric consultation report (CR) was handed out to patients, (3) GPs received standard discharge letters of the hospital physicians (communication as usual, CAU). Six weeks after the CL-episode, patients were phoned at home and asked about implementation of recommendations by their GP's. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to monitor anxious and depressive symptoms.
GP-concordance was highest in the TC group, followed by the CR group with significant improvements in medication and psychotherapeutic recommendations compared to CAU. Higher concordance was associated with a significant greater decrease in HADS depression scores but not anxiety scores after 6weeks.
Telephone communication between CL-psychiatrists and GPs improve GPs' concordance with psychiatric recommendations. This easy-to-implement intervention takes about 10min time but prevents loss of information. It may enhance quality of GPs' mental health care and lead to improved outcomes.
全科医生(GP)对会诊联络(CL)精神科医生建议的依从性几乎未得到系统研究。我们研究了对于在内外科病房接受治疗的患者,来自医院CL服务部门给全科医生的电话或书面记录,与医院医生通过标准出院小结的常规沟通方式相比,是否能提高全科医生的依从性,以及更高的全科医生依从性是否能改善抑郁和焦虑症状的结局。
116名因抑郁和焦虑被转介至CL服务部门的综合医院住院患者被分配到CL服务部门与全科医生之间的三组沟通途径中:(1)CL精神科医生与全科医生进行电话沟通(TC);(2)将精神科会诊报告(CR)的副本交给患者;(3)全科医生收到医院医生的标准出院小结(常规沟通,CAU)。CL服务结束六周后,在家中致电患者,询问其全科医生对建议的执行情况。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)监测焦虑和抑郁症状。
TC组中全科医生的依从性最高,其次是CR组,与CAU相比,在药物治疗和心理治疗建议方面有显著改善。六周后,更高的依从性与HADS抑郁评分的显著更大幅度下降相关,但与焦虑评分无关。
CL精神科医生与全科医生之间的电话沟通可提高全科医生对精神科建议的依从性。这种易于实施的干预措施大约需要10分钟,但可防止信息丢失。它可能会提高全科医生心理健康护理的质量并带来更好的结局。