Kohl Kevin D, Brun Antonio, Magallanes Melisa, Brinkerhoff Joshua, Laspiur Alejandro, Acosta Juan Carlos, Bordenstein Seth R, Caviedes-Vidal Enrique
Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, 465 21st Ave South, Nashville, TN 37235, USA Laboratorio de Biología Integrativa, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, San Luis 5700, Argentina Departamento de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Chacabuco 917, San Luis 5700, Argentina
Laboratorio de Biología Integrativa, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, San Luis 5700, Argentina Departamento de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Chacabuco 917, San Luis 5700, Argentina.
J Exp Biol. 2016 Jun 15;219(Pt 12):1903-12. doi: 10.1242/jeb.138370.
While herbivory is a common feeding strategy in a number of vertebrate classes, less than 4% of squamate reptiles feed primarily on plant material. It has been hypothesized that physiological or microbial limitations may constrain the evolution of herbivory in lizards. Herbivorous lizards exhibit adaptations in digestive morphology and function that allow them to better assimilate plant material. However, it is unknown whether these traits are fixed or perhaps phenotypically flexible as a result of diet. Here, we maintained a naturally omnivorous lizard, Liolaemus ruibali, on a mixed diet of 50% insects and 50% plant material, or a plant-rich diet of 90% plant material. We compared parameters of digestive performance, gut morphology and function, and gut microbial community structure between the two groups. We found that lizards fed the plant-rich diet maintained nitrogen balance and exhibited low minimum nitrogen requirements. Additionally, lizards fed the plant-rich diet exhibited significantly longer small intestines and larger hindguts, demonstrating that gut morphology is phenotypically flexible. Lizards fed the plant-rich diet harbored small intestinal communities that were more diverse and enriched in Melainabacteria and Oscillospira compared with mixed diet-fed lizards. Additionally, the relative abundance of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the small intestine significantly correlated with whole-animal fiber digestibility. Thus, we suggest that physiological and microbial limitations do not sensu stricto constrain the evolution of herbivory in lizards. Rather, ecological context and fitness consequences may be more important in driving the evolution of this feeding strategy.
虽然食草是许多脊椎动物类群常见的摄食策略,但只有不到4%的有鳞目爬行动物主要以植物为食。据推测,生理或微生物限制可能会制约蜥蜴食草习性的进化。食草蜥蜴在消化形态和功能上表现出适应性,使它们能够更好地同化植物性物质。然而,尚不清楚这些特征是固定不变的,还是可能因饮食而在表型上具有灵活性。在这里,我们让一种自然杂食性蜥蜴——鲁氏鬃狮蜥,分别食用由50%昆虫和50%植物性物质组成的混合食物,或由90%植物性物质组成的高植物性食物。我们比较了两组蜥蜴的消化性能、肠道形态和功能以及肠道微生物群落结构参数。我们发现,食用高植物性食物的蜥蜴维持了氮平衡,且最低氮需求量较低。此外,食用高植物性食物的蜥蜴小肠明显更长,后肠更大,这表明肠道形态在表型上具有灵活性。与食用混合食物的蜥蜴相比,食用高植物性食物的蜥蜴小肠群落更加多样化,且黑素杆菌和颤螺菌更为丰富。此外,小肠中硫酸盐还原菌的相对丰度与动物整体纤维消化率显著相关。因此,我们认为生理和微生物限制严格意义上并不制约蜥蜴食草习性的进化。相反,生态环境和适应性后果在推动这种摄食策略的进化中可能更为重要。