Hegde Rahul J, Bapna Kavita
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;7(2):216-20. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.183064.
Root canal irrigants are considered momentous in their tissue dissolving property, eliminating microorganisms, and removing smear layer. The present study was aimed to compare the removal of endodontic smear layer using ethylene glycol bis (beta-amino ethyl ether)-N, N, N', N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) and citric acid solutions with saline as a control in primary anterior teeth.
Thirty primary anterior teeth were chosen for the study. The teeth were distributed into three groups having ten teeth each. Following instrumentation, root canals of the first group were treated with 17% EGTA and the second group with 6% citric acid. Only saline was used as an irrigant for the control group. Then, the teeth were subjected to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study. The scale given by Rome et al. for the smear layer removal was used in the present study.
The pictures from the SEM showed that among the tested irrigants, 17% EGTA + 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) group showed the best results when compared to other groups.
The results advocate that the sequential irrigation of the pulp canal walls with 17% EGTA followed by 5% NaOCl produced efficacious and smear-free root canal walls.
根管冲洗剂在溶解组织、消除微生物和去除玷污层方面具有重要作用。本研究旨在比较在乳牙前牙中,使用乙二醇双(β-氨基乙醚)-N,N,N',N'-四乙酸(EGTA)和柠檬酸溶液与生理盐水作为对照去除牙髓腔玷污层的效果。
选取30颗乳牙前牙进行研究。将牙齿分为三组,每组10颗。根管预备后,第一组根管用17%的EGTA处理,第二组用6%的柠檬酸处理。对照组仅用生理盐水作为冲洗剂。然后,对牙齿进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究。本研究采用Rome等人给出的玷污层去除评分标准。
扫描电子显微镜的图片显示,在测试的冲洗剂中,17%的EGTA + 5%的次氯酸钠(NaOCl)组与其他组相比效果最佳。
结果表明,先用17%的EGTA然后用5%的NaOCl依次冲洗牙髓腔壁,可产生有效且无玷污层的根管壁。