Berry S, Dawicki D D, Agarwal K C, Steiner M
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket 02860.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989 Jun 15;1012(1):46-56. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(89)90009-8.
The role of microtubules in platelet aggregation and secretion has been analyzed using platelets permeabilized with digitonin and monoclonal antibodies to alpha (DM1A) and beta (DM1B) subunits of tubulin. Permeabilized platelets were able to undergo aggregation and secretory release. However, threshold doses of agonists capable of eliciting a second wave of aggregation and the platelet release reaction were higher than in control platelets exposed to dimethyl sulfoxide, the solvent for digitonin. Both antibodies to alpha and beta tubulin caused a further increase in the threshold concentration of agonists and inhibited the secretory release of permeabilized platelets, but were ineffective using intact platelets. Neither monoclonal antibody inhibited polymerization or depolymerization of platelet tubulin in vitro. Antibodies to platelet actin and myosin also exhibited an inhibitory activity on platelet aggregation albeit less severe than that observed with the antibodies to alpha and beta tubulin. There was evidence of an interaction between DM1A and DM1B and the antibodies to actin and myosin. The interaction of platelet tubulin and myosin was investigated by two different methods. (1) Coprecipitation of the proteins at low ionic strength at which tubulin by itself did not precipitate and (2) affinity chromatography on columns of immobilized myosin. Tubulin freed of its associated proteins (MAPs) by phosphocellulose chromatography bound to myosin in a molar ratio which approached 2. Platelet actin competed with tubulin for 1 binding site on the myosin molecule. MAPs also reduced the binding stoichiometry of tubulin/myosin. Treatment of microtubule protein with p-chloromercuribenzoate or colchicine did not influence its binding to myosin. DM1A and DM1B inhibited the interaction of tubulin and myosin. This effect could also be demonstrated by reaction of electrophoretic transblots of extracted platelet tubulin with the respective proteins. We interpret these results as evidence for an interference of the two monoclonal antibodies to the tubulin subunits (DM1A and DM1B) with the translocation of microtubule protein from its submembranous site to a more central one during the activation process.
利用经洋地黄皂苷通透处理的血小板以及针对微管蛋白α(DM1A)和β(DM1B)亚基的单克隆抗体,分析了微管在血小板聚集和分泌中的作用。通透处理的血小板能够发生聚集和分泌释放。然而,能够引发第二波聚集和血小板释放反应的激动剂阈值剂量高于暴露于洋地黄皂苷溶剂二甲基亚砜的对照血小板。抗α和β微管蛋白的两种抗体均使激动剂的阈值浓度进一步升高,并抑制通透处理血小板的分泌释放,但对完整血小板无效。两种单克隆抗体在体外均未抑制血小板微管蛋白的聚合或解聚。抗血小板肌动蛋白和肌球蛋白的抗体对血小板聚集也表现出抑制活性,尽管其抑制程度不如抗α和β微管蛋白的抗体严重。有证据表明DM1A和DM1B与抗肌动蛋白和肌球蛋白的抗体之间存在相互作用。通过两种不同方法研究了血小板微管蛋白与肌球蛋白的相互作用。(1)在低离子强度下蛋白质的共沉淀,此时微管蛋白自身不会沉淀;(2)在固定化肌球蛋白柱上进行亲和层析。经磷酸纤维素层析去除其相关蛋白(微管相关蛋白)的微管蛋白以接近2的摩尔比与肌球蛋白结合。血小板肌动蛋白与微管蛋白竞争肌球蛋白分子上的1个结合位点。微管相关蛋白也降低了微管蛋白/肌球蛋白的结合化学计量。用对氯汞苯甲酸或秋水仙碱处理微管蛋白不影响其与肌球蛋白的结合。DM1A和DM1B抑制微管蛋白与肌球蛋白的相互作用。这种效应也可以通过提取的血小板微管蛋白的电泳转印与相应蛋白质的反应来证明。我们将这些结果解释为两种针对微管蛋白亚基的单克隆抗体(DM1A和DM1B)在激活过程中干扰微管蛋白从其膜下位点向更中心位点转运的证据。