Suppr超能文献

肺炎合并肺栓塞:仍是诊断难题?一项针对100例患者的病例对照研究结果

Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients.

作者信息

Paparoupa Maria, Spineli Loukia, Framke Theodor, Ho Huy, Schuppert Frank, Gillissen Adrian

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Institute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Dis Markers. 2016;2016:8682506. doi: 10.1155/2016/8682506. Epub 2016 May 25.

Abstract

This study evaluated the diagnostic value of D-dimer, CRP, and leucocytes count to detect an underlying pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with pneumonia. A predictive model of an underlying PE, based on laboratory markers and clinical symptoms, was our ultimate objective. Overall 100 patients underwent a computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lung: 54 with coexistence of PE and pneumonia (cases) and 46 with pneumonia without PE (controls). Cases and controls were matched 1 : 1. Symptoms and paraclinical findings were registered on admission. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, search for an optimal threshold, and conditional logistic regression analysis were conducted. D-dimer has a moderate ability to detect PE in pneumonia. Sensitivity of D-dimer was estimated at 97.78% and specificity at 11.11%. No optimal cut-point has acceptable diagnostic ability. After excluding patients with sepsis, sensitivity was reduced to 96.97%, whereas specificity increased to 16.13%. Consolidation in chest X-ray and positive D-dimer predict better an underlying PE as D-dimer itself. Thus, discriminatory power of the prediction model (AUC of 0.740) is not much greater than D-dimer (AUC of 0.703). No threshold that could increase the diagnostic value of D-dimer or a prediction model which is significantly better than D-dimer itself was identified.

摘要

本研究评估了D-二聚体、C反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞计数对检测肺炎患者潜在肺栓塞(PE)的诊断价值。基于实验室指标和临床症状建立潜在PE的预测模型是我们的最终目标。共有100例患者接受了肺部计算机断层血管造影(CTA)检查:54例为PE合并肺炎(病例组),46例为无PE的肺炎患者(对照组)。病例组和对照组按1:1配对。入院时记录症状和辅助检查结果。进行了受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析、寻找最佳阈值以及条件逻辑回归分析。D-二聚体检测肺炎患者中PE的能力中等。D-二聚体的敏感性估计为97.78%,特异性为11.11%。没有最佳切点具有可接受的诊断能力。排除脓毒症患者后,敏感性降至96.97%,而特异性升至16.13%。胸部X线片上的实变和D-二聚体阳性对潜在PE的预测效果优于单独的D-二聚体。因此,预测模型的鉴别能力(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.740)并不比D-二聚体(AUC为0.703)高很多。未发现能提高D-二聚体诊断价值的阈值或明显优于D-二聚体本身的预测模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e1f/4897677/fc9918b8f930/DM2016-8682506.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验