McGuire Joseph F, Wu Monica S, Piacentini John, McCracken James T, Storch Eric A
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, 760 Westwood Plaza, 48-228B, Los Angeles, CA, 90095.
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;78(2):196-206. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15r10334.
This meta-analysis examined treatment efficacy, treatment response, and diagnostic remission effect sizes and moderators of D-cycloserine-augmented exposure treatment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of individuals with anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The terms D-cycloserine AND randomized controlled trial were used to search the PubMed (1965-May 2015), PsycINFO, and Scopus databases for randomized placebo-controlled trials of D-cycloserine-augmented exposure therapy for anxiety disorders, OCD, and PTSD.
Clinical variables and effect sizes were extracted from 20 RCTs (957 participants). A random-effects model calculated the effect sizes for treatment efficacy, treatment response, and diagnostic remission using standardized rating scales. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to examine potential moderators.
A small, nonsignificant benefit of D-cycloserine augmentation compared to placebo augmentation was identified across treatment efficacy (g = 0.15), response (risk ratio [RR] = 1.08), and remission (RR = 1.109), with a moderately significant effect (P = .03) for anxiety disorders specifically (g = 0.33). At initial follow-up assessments, a small, nonsignificant effect size of D-cycloserine augmentation compared to placebo was found for treatment efficacy (g = 0.21), response (RR = 1.06), and remission (RR = 1.12). Specific treatment moderators (eg, comorbidity, medication status, gender, publication year) were found across conditions for both acute treatment and initial follow-up assessments.
D-Cycloserine does not universally enhance treatment outcomes but demonstrates promise for anxiety disorders. Distinct treatment moderators may account for discrepant findings across RCTs and disorders. Future trials may be strengthened by accounting for identified moderators in their design, with ongoing research needed on the mechanisms of D-cycloserine to tailor treatment protocols and maximize its benefit.
本荟萃分析在焦虑症、强迫症(OCD)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的随机对照试验(RCT)中,考察了D-环丝氨酸强化暴露疗法的治疗效果、治疗反应、诊断缓解效应量及调节因素。
使用“D-环丝氨酸”和“随机对照试验”检索词,在PubMed(1965年至2015年5月)、PsycINFO和Scopus数据库中搜索D-环丝氨酸强化暴露疗法治疗焦虑症、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍的随机安慰剂对照试验。
从20项RCT(957名参与者)中提取临床变量和效应量。采用随机效应模型,使用标准化评定量表计算治疗效果、治疗反应和诊断缓解的效应量。进行亚组分析和元回归以考察潜在的调节因素。
与安慰剂强化相比,D-环丝氨酸强化在治疗效果(g = 0.15)、反应(风险比[RR] = 1.08)和缓解(RR = 1.109)方面有小的、不显著的益处,对于焦虑症有中度显著效应(P = 0.03)(g = 0.33)。在初始随访评估中,与安慰剂相比,D-环丝氨酸强化在治疗效果(g = 0.21)、反应(RR = 1.06)和缓解(RR = 1.12)方面有小的、不显著的效应量。在急性治疗和初始随访评估的各种情况下均发现了特定的治疗调节因素(如共病、用药情况、性别、发表年份)。
D-环丝氨酸并非普遍增强治疗效果,但对焦虑症显示出前景。不同的治疗调节因素可能解释了不同RCT和疾病之间的不一致结果。未来的试验可通过在设计中考虑已确定的调节因素来加强,需要对D-环丝氨酸的作用机制进行持续研究,以调整治疗方案并使其益处最大化。