Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indiana University, Department of Neurological Surgery.
Department of Biostatistics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Neurosurg. 2017 May;126(5):1606-1613. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152951. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
OBJECTIVE Aneurysmal rebleeding before definitive obliteration of the aneurysm is a cause of mortality and morbidity. There are limited data on the role of short-term antifibrinolytic therapy among patients undergoing endovascular intervention. METHODS All consecutive patients receiving endovascular therapy for their ruptured saccular aneurysm at the authors' institution between 2000 and 2011 were included in this study. These patients underwent endovascular coiling of their aneurysm within 72 hours of admission. In patients receiving ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA), the EACA administration was continued until the time of the endovascular procedure. Complications and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) were compared between EACA-treated and untreated patients. RESULTS During the 12-year study period, 341 patients underwent endovascular coiling. Short-term EACA treatment was administered in 146 patients and was withheld in the other 195 patients. EACA treatment did not change the risk of preinterventional rebleeding in this study (OR 0.782, 95% CI 0.176-3.480; p = 0.747). Moreover, EACA treatment did not increase the rate of thromboembolic events. On the other hand, patients who received EACA treatment had a significantly longer duration of hospital stay compared with their counterparts who were not treated with EACA (median 19 days, interquartile range [IQR] 12.5-30 days vs median 14 days, IQR 10-23 days; p < 0.001). EACA treatment was associated with increased odds of shunt requirement (OR 2.047, 95% CI 1.043-4.018; p = 0.037) and decreased odds of developing cardiac complications (OR 0.138, 95% CI 0.031-0.604; p = 0.009) and respiratory insufficiency (OR 0.471, 95% CI 0.239-0.926; p = 0.029). Short-term EACA treatment did not affect the Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge, 6 months, or 1 year following discharge. CONCLUSIONS In this study, short-term EACA treatment in patients who suffered from aSAH and received endovascular aneurysm repair did not decrease the risk of preinterventional rebleeding or increase the risk of thrombotic events. EACA did not affect outcome. Randomized clinical trials are required to provide robust clinical recommendation on short-term use of EACA.
在对动脉瘤进行确定性闭塞之前,动脉瘤再出血是导致死亡和发病的原因。目前关于接受血管内介入治疗的患者短期应用抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗的作用的数据有限。
本研究纳入了 2000 年至 2011 年期间在作者所在机构接受血管内治疗的破裂囊状动脉瘤的连续患者。这些患者在入院后 72 小时内接受了血管内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞术。在接受 ε-氨基己酸(EACA)治疗的患者中,EACA 治疗持续至血管内治疗时。比较 EACA 治疗和未治疗患者的蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后血管内治疗的并发症和临床结局。
在 12 年的研究期间,341 例患者接受了血管内弹簧圈栓塞术。146 例患者短期接受 EACA 治疗,195 例患者未接受 EACA 治疗。本研究中,EACA 治疗并未改变术前再出血的风险(OR 0.782,95%CI 0.176-3.480;p = 0.747)。此外,EACA 治疗并未增加血栓栓塞事件的发生率。另一方面,与未接受 EACA 治疗的患者相比,接受 EACA 治疗的患者的住院时间明显延长(中位数 19 天,四分位距[IQR] 12.5-30 天 vs 中位数 14 天,IQR 10-23 天;p < 0.001)。EACA 治疗与需要分流术的几率增加相关(OR 2.047,95%CI 1.043-4.018;p = 0.037),与发生心脏并发症的几率降低相关(OR 0.138,95%CI 0.031-0.604;p = 0.009)和呼吸功能不全的几率降低相关(OR 0.471,95%CI 0.239-0.926;p = 0.029)。短期 EACA 治疗并未影响出院时、6 个月和 1 年的格拉斯哥预后评分。
在本研究中,接受血管内动脉瘤修复的 aSAH 患者短期应用 EACA 治疗并未降低术前再出血的风险或增加血栓事件的风险。EACA 对结果没有影响。需要进行随机临床试验,以提供短期应用 EACA 的有力临床建议。