Kurstjens Ralph L M, de Wolf Mark A F, Alsadah Sarah A, Arnoldussen Carsten W K P, Strijkers Rob H W, Toonder Irwin M, Wittens Cees H A
Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Jul;4(3):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
Air plethysmography (APG) is a functional, noninvasive test that can assess volumetric changes in the lower limb and might therefore be used as a diagnostic tool in chronic deep venous disease. However, use of APG in chronic deep venous obstructive disease remains debatable. This study assessed the clinical value of APG in identifying chronic deep venous obstruction.
All patients referred to our tertiary, outpatient clinic between January 2011 and August 2013 with chronic venous complaints and suspected outflow obstruction underwent an outflow fraction (OF), ejection fraction (EF), and residual volume fraction (RVF) test using APG. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance venography were used to establish whether and where obstruction was present. Diagnostic values of these tests were assessed for obstructions at different levels of the deep venous system.
A total of 312 limbs in 248 patients were tested. Mean age was 45.5 ± 14.0 years, and 62.5% were female. In post-thrombotic disease, specificity and positive predictive value for OF were as high as 98.4% and 95.0%, respectively; however, sensitivity was 34.8% and negative predictive value was 29.6%, with no clinically relevant positive or negative likelihood ratios. No clinically relevant differences were observed in stratifying for level of obstruction. EF and RVF were as inconclusive. Neither could these parameters be used in diagnosing nonthrombotic iliac vein compression.
We found a poor correlation between OF, EF, or RVF, determined by APG, and the presence of chronic deep venous obstruction. Therefore, use of its relative parameters is unwarranted in daily clinical practice.
空气容积描记法(APG)是一种功能性非侵入性检查,可评估下肢的容积变化,因此可能用作慢性深静脉疾病的诊断工具。然而,APG在慢性深静脉阻塞性疾病中的应用仍存在争议。本研究评估了APG在识别慢性深静脉阻塞方面的临床价值。
2011年1月至2013年8月期间,所有转诊至我们三级门诊、有慢性静脉症状且怀疑有流出道阻塞的患者均接受了使用APG的流出分数(OF)、射血分数(EF)和残余容积分数(RVF)检查。使用双功超声和磁共振静脉造影来确定是否存在阻塞以及阻塞的部位。评估这些检查对于深静脉系统不同水平阻塞的诊断价值。
共对248例患者的312条肢体进行了检测。平均年龄为45.5±14.0岁,62.5%为女性。在血栓形成后疾病中,OF的特异性和阳性预测值分别高达98.4%和95.0%;然而,敏感性为34.8%,阴性预测值为29.6%,没有临床相关的阳性或阴性似然比。在按阻塞水平分层时未观察到临床相关差异。EF和RVF同样没有定论。这些参数也不能用于诊断非血栓性髂静脉受压。
我们发现由APG测定的OF、EF或RVF与慢性深静脉阻塞的存在之间相关性较差。因此,在日常临床实践中使用其相关参数是不必要的。