Hoertel Nicolas, Blanco Carlos, Peyre Hugo, Wall Melanie M, McMahon Kibby, Gorwood Philip, Lemogne Cédric, Limosin Frédéric
Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, USA; AP-HP, Corentin Celton Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France; Paris Descartes University, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; INSERM UMR 894, Psychiatry and Neurosciences Center, Paris, France.
Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 1;204:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.042. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
The inclusion of subsyndromal forms of bipolarity in the fifth edition of the DSM has major implications for the way in which we approach the diagnosis of individuals with depressive symptoms. The aim of the present study was to use methods based on item response theory (IRT) to examine whether, when equating for levels of depression severity, there are differences in the likelihood of reporting DSM-IV symptoms of major depressive episode (MDE) between subjects with and without a lifetime history of manic symptoms.
We conducted these analyses using a large, nationally representative sample from the USA (n=34,653), the second wave of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
The items sadness, appetite disturbance and psychomotor symptoms were better indicators of depression severity in participants without a lifetime history of manic symptoms, in a clinically meaningful way. DSM-IV symptoms of MDE were substantially less informative in participants with a lifetime history of manic symptoms than in those without such history.
Clinical information on DSM-IV depressive and manic symptoms was based on retrospective self-report
The clinical presentation of depressive symptoms may substantially differ in individuals with and without a lifetime history of manic symptoms. These findings alert to the possibility of atypical symptomatic presentations among individuals with co-occurring symptoms or disorders and highlight the importance of continued research into specific pathophysiology differentiating unipolar and bipolar depression.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中纳入双相情感障碍的亚综合征形式,对我们诊断有抑郁症状个体的方式具有重大影响。本研究的目的是使用基于项目反应理论(IRT)的方法,来检验在抑郁严重程度水平相等的情况下,有和没有躁狂症状终生史的受试者报告重度抑郁发作(MDE)的DSM-IV症状的可能性是否存在差异。
我们使用来自美国的一个具有全国代表性的大样本(n = 34,653)进行了这些分析,该样本来自全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查的第二轮。
悲伤、食欲紊乱和精神运动症状等项目,对于没有躁狂症状终生史的参与者来说,以一种具有临床意义的方式,是抑郁严重程度更好的指标。有躁狂症状终生史的参与者中,MDE的DSM-IV症状所提供的信息,比没有此类病史的参与者要少得多。
关于DSM-IV抑郁和躁狂症状的临床信息基于回顾性自我报告。
有和没有躁狂症状终生史的个体,其抑郁症状的临床表现可能有很大差异。这些发现提醒人们注意,在有共病症状或障碍的个体中可能存在非典型症状表现,并强调继续研究区分单相抑郁和双相抑郁的特定病理生理学的重要性。