van der Laan M C, Rietveld T, de Boer S B B
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2016;58(6):471-5.
The reduction of coercive measures in psychiatry, particularly of seclusion, is considered to be a matter of some urgency. When policy changes with regard to coercive measures are being considered, the wishes and preferences of patients should be taken into account. Up till now, however, there have not been any studies that have examined how adolescent inpatients feel about coercive measures.
To examine the way adolescent inpatients feel about seclusion and other forms of coercive measures.
Adolescent inpatients in a Dutch centre for orthopsychiatry (n = 34) were asked about their experiences with and their thoughts on coercive measures in general and on seclusion in particular.
Thirty-two respondents took part. More than half of the 18 adolescents who had had prior experiences of coercive measures preferred seclusion to involuntary medication.
Policy-makers who want to reduce coercive measures in psychiatry should not focus primarily on the reduction of seclusion. Patient preferences, which vary depending on the nature of the patient population, need to be considered carefully and taken into account.
减少精神病学中的强制手段,尤其是隔离措施,被认为是一项亟待解决的问题。在考虑对强制手段进行政策变革时,应考虑患者的意愿和偏好。然而,到目前为止,尚无任何研究探讨青少年住院患者对强制手段的感受。
研究青少年住院患者对隔离及其他形式强制手段的感受。
在荷兰一家儿童精神病治疗中心询问了34名青少年住院患者关于他们对一般强制手段,特别是隔离措施的经历和看法。
32名受访者参与了调查。在18名曾有过强制手段经历的青少年中,超过一半的人更喜欢隔离而非非自愿用药。
想要减少精神病学中强制手段的政策制定者不应主要关注减少隔离措施。需要仔细考虑并顾及因患者群体性质而异的患者偏好。