Kunkitti P, Sjödahl A, Bergqvist A-S, Johannisson A, Axnér E
Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Surgery and Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Reprod Domest Anim. 2016 Aug;51(4):618-22. doi: 10.1111/rda.12710. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
DNA fragmentation of frozen-thawed feline epididymal sperm from corpus and cauda regions was evaluated by three different techniques. The DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was compared between techniques: the sperm chromatin structural assay (SCSA(®) ), acridine orange staining techniques (AOT) and the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD). There were significant differences in DFI among the techniques (p < 0.05) with no correlations. Only DFI values obtained from SCD revealed a significantly higher DFI in corpus compared with cauda spermatozoa (p < 0.05). The discrepancy between techniques might be due to the sensitivity of each technique, differences in severity of DNA damaged that can be detected. The difference in DFI between epididymal regions from SCD technique might indicate different maturational stages of spermatozoa, with less chromatin condensation of spermatozoa in corpus compared with cauda epididymis.
采用三种不同技术评估了来自猫附睾体部和尾部区域的冻融精子的DNA片段化情况。对各技术之间的DNA片段化指数(DFI)进行了比较:精子染色质结构分析(SCSA(®))、吖啶橙染色技术(AOT)和精子染色质扩散(SCD)。各技术之间的DFI存在显著差异(p < 0.05),且无相关性。仅SCD获得的DFI值显示,附睾体部精子的DFI显著高于尾部精子(p < 0.05)。各技术之间的差异可能是由于每种技术的敏感性不同,以及可检测到的DNA损伤严重程度的差异。SCD技术显示的附睾不同区域之间DFI的差异可能表明精子处于不同的成熟阶段,与附睾尾部相比,附睾体部精子的染色质凝聚程度较低。