Kim Jeri, Davis John W, Klein Eric A, Magi-Galluzzi Cristina, Lotan Yair, Ward John F, Pisters Louis L, Basler Joseph W, Pettaway Curtis A, Stephenson Andrew, Li Ning Tapia Elsa M, Efstathiou Eleni, Wang Xuemei, Do Kim-Anh, Lee J Jack, Gorlov Ivan P, Vornik Lana A, Hoque Ashraful M, Prokhorova Ina N, Parnes Howard L, Lippman Scott M, Thompson Ian M, Brown Powel H, Logothetis Christopher J, Troncoso Patricia
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
EBioMedicine. 2016 May;7:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.03.047. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
In the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, finasteride selectively suppressed low-grade prostate cancer and significantly reduced the incidence of prostate cancer in men treated with finasteride compared with placebo. However, an apparent increase in high-grade disease was also observed among men randomized to finasteride. We aimed to determine why and hypothesized that there is a grade-dependent response to finasteride.
From 2007 to 2012, we randomized dynamically by intranet-accessible software 183 men with localized prostate cancer to receive 5mg finasteride or placebo daily in a double-blind study during the 4-6weeks preceding prostatectomy. As the primary end point, the expression of a predefined molecular signature (ERβ, UBE2C, SRD5A2, and VEGF) differentiating high- and low-grade tumors in Gleason grade (GG) 3 areas of finasteride-exposed tumors from those in GG3 areas of placebo-exposed tumors, adjusted for Gleason score (GS) at prostatectomy, was compared. We also determined androgen receptor (AR) levels, Ki-67, and cleaved caspase 3 to evaluate the effects of finasteride on the expression of its downstream target, cell proliferation, and apoptosis, respectively. The expression of these markers was also compared across grades between and within treatment groups. Logistic regression was used to assess the expression of markers.
We found that the predetermined molecular signature did not distinguish GG3 from GG4 areas in the placebo group. However, AR expression was significantly lower in the GG4 areas of the finasteride group than in those of the placebo group. Within the finasteride group, AR expression was also lower in GG4 than in GG3 areas, but not significantly. Expression of cleaved caspase 3 was significantly increased in both GG3 and GG4 areas in the finasteride group compared to the placebo group, although it was lower in GG4 than in GG3 areas in both groups.
We showed that finasteride's effect on apoptosis and AR expression is tumor grade dependent after short-term intervention. This may explain finasteride's selective suppression of low-grade tumors observed in the PCPT.
在前列腺癌预防试验中,非那雄胺选择性抑制低级别前列腺癌,与安慰剂相比,接受非那雄胺治疗的男性前列腺癌发病率显著降低。然而,在随机接受非那雄胺治疗的男性中也观察到高级别疾病明显增加。我们旨在确定原因,并假设对非那雄胺存在分级依赖性反应。
2007年至2012年,在前列腺切除术前行4至6周的双盲研究中,我们通过可通过内联网访问的软件将183例局限性前列腺癌男性动态随机分组,分别每日接受5mg非那雄胺或安慰剂治疗。作为主要终点,比较了在前列腺切除术中根据Gleason评分(GS)调整后,区分非那雄胺暴露肿瘤的Gleason分级(GG)3区中高级别和低级别肿瘤的预定义分子特征(ERβ、UBE2C、SRD5A2和VEGF)在非那雄胺暴露肿瘤的GG3区与安慰剂暴露肿瘤的GG3区中的表达。我们还测定了雄激素受体(AR)水平、Ki-67和裂解的半胱天冬酶3,以分别评估非那雄胺对其下游靶点表达、细胞增殖和凋亡的影响。还比较了治疗组之间和组内不同分级的这些标志物的表达。采用逻辑回归评估标志物的表达。
我们发现,在安慰剂组中,预定义的分子特征无法区分GG3区和GG4区。然而,非那雄胺组的GG4区中AR表达显著低于安慰剂组。在非那雄胺组内,GG4区的AR表达也低于GG3区,但差异不显著。与安慰剂组相比,非那雄胺组的GG3区和GG4区中裂解的半胱天冬酶3表达均显著增加,尽管在两组中GG4区的表达均低于GG3区。
我们表明,短期干预后,非那雄胺对凋亡和AR表达的影响具有肿瘤分级依赖性。这可能解释了在前列腺癌预防试验中观察到的非那雄胺对低级别肿瘤的选择性抑制作用。