Albert Benjamin B, de Bock Martin, Derraik José G B, Brennan Christine M, Biggs Janene B, Hofman Paul L, Cutfield Wayne S
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Gravida: National Centre for Growth and Development, Auckland, New Zealand.
Heart Lung Circ. 2016 Dec;25(12):1218-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 May 17.
We aimed to assess insulin sensitivity and other metabolic features of dippers and non-dippers among overweight middle-aged men.
We studied 73 men (45.8 ± 5.3 years) who were overweight but normotensive. Participants were separated into dippers and non-dippers based on the magnitude of the nocturnal decline of blood pressure, with dippers experiencing an overnight decline ≥10% as per standard definition. Our study included 51 dippers and 22 non-dippers. All participants underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the Matsuda method from an oral glucose tolerance test; other assessments included carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT), body composition derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, lipid profiles, and a physical activity questionnaire.
Non-dippers had lower daytime systolic (-5.0mmHg; p=0.022) and diastolic (-3.3mmHg; p=0.035) blood pressure than dippers. Conversely, during sleep, non-dippers had higher systolic (+6.5mmHg; p=0.003) and diastolic (+5.6mmHg; p=0.001) blood pressure. In continuous associations, increasing CIMT was associated with decreasing systolic (p=0.012) and diastolic (p=0.042) dipping. Thus, non-dippers had CIMT that was 9% greater than that of dippers (749 vs 820μm; p=0.036). Importantly, there was no association between non-dipping status or the magnitude of the nocturnal dip with insulin sensitivity.
Non-dippers had lower blood pressure in the daytime, but higher blood pressure in the night time compared to dippers. Non-dippers had increased CIMT, which suggests that normotensive men with a non-dipping ambulatory blood pressure profile may be at increased cardiovascular risk. However, it appears that the non-dipping profile is unrelated to dysfunction of glucose homeostasis in overweight normotensive men.
我们旨在评估超重中年男性中勺型血压者和非勺型血压者的胰岛素敏感性及其他代谢特征。
我们研究了73名超重但血压正常的男性(45.8±5.3岁)。根据夜间血压下降幅度将参与者分为勺型血压者和非勺型血压者,按照标准定义,勺型血压者夜间血压下降≥10%。我们的研究包括51名勺型血压者和22名非勺型血压者。所有参与者均接受24小时动态血压监测。通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验采用松田法评估胰岛素敏感性;其他评估包括颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)、双能X线吸收法测定的身体成分、血脂谱以及一份体力活动问卷。
非勺型血压者白天收缩压(-5.0mmHg;p=0.022)和舒张压(-3.3mmHg;p=0.035)低于勺型血压者。相反,在睡眠期间,非勺型血压者收缩压(+6.5mmHg;p=0.003)和舒张压(+5.6mmHg;p=0.001)更高。在连续相关性分析中,CIMT增加与收缩压(p=0.012)和舒张压(p=0.042)下降幅度减小相关。因此,非勺型血压者的CIMT比勺型血压者大9%(749对820μm;p=0.036)。重要的是,非勺型血压状态或夜间血压下降幅度与胰岛素敏感性之间无关联。
与勺型血压者相比,非勺型血压者白天血压较低,但夜间血压较高。非勺型血压者CIMT增加,这表明动态血压呈非勺型的血压正常男性可能心血管风险增加。然而,在超重血压正常男性中,非勺型血压模式似乎与葡萄糖稳态功能障碍无关。