Valenta Ines, Antoniou Alexander, Marashdeh Wael, Leucker Thorsten, Kasper Edward, Jones Steven R, Dannals Robert F, Solnes Lilja, Pomper Martin G, Schindler Thomas H
Division of Nuclear Medicine - Cardiovascular Section, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, JHOC 3225, 601 N. Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 May 1;18(5):538-548. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew116.
We aimed to evaluate whether a PET-determined longitudinal decrease in myocardial blood flow (MBF) or gradient, assumed as a more specific flow parameter for epicardial resistance, correlates with invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.
In 29 patients with suspected or known CAD, myocardial perfusion and MBF in mL/g/min was determined with 13N-ammonia PET/CT during regadenoson stimulation and at rest, and corresponding myocardial flow reserve (MFR = MBF stress/MBF rest) was calculated. MBF parameters were assessed in the myocardial region with stress-related perfusion defect and with stenosis ≥50% (Region 1), without defect but with stenosis ≥50% (Region 2), or without stenosis ≥50% (Region 3). Hyperaemic MBFs were significantly lower in the mid-distal than in the mid-left ventricular myocardium in Regions 1-3 [median and IQ range: 1.57 (1.24, 1.84) vs. 1.87 (1.61, 2.00), and 1.23 (1.11, 1.86) vs. 1.89 (1.80, 1.97), and 1.78 (1.48, 2.00) vs. 1.94 (1.84, 2.05) mL/g/min, P < 0.0001]. Resulting longitudinal MBF gradient during hyperaemic flows was more pronounced in Region 2 than in Regions 1 and 3, respectively [-0.46 (-0.70, -0.10) vs. -0.17 (-0.29, -0.11) and -0.15 (-0.25, -0.09) mL/g/min, respectively, P < 0.01]. There was a significant correlation between the hyperaemic longitudinal MBF gradient and FFR (r = 0.95; P < 0.0001), while this association was less pronounced for corresponding MFR (r = 0.50; P = 0.006).
The observed close correlation between a longitudinal MBF gradient during hyperaemic flows and invasively measured FFR suggests the longitudinal flow gradient as an emerging non-invasive index of flow-limiting CAD.
我们旨在评估正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测定的心肌血流量(MBF)或梯度的纵向降低(假定为心外膜阻力的更具体血流参数)是否与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者经有创测量的血流储备分数(FFR)相关。
在29例疑似或已知CAD的患者中,使用13N-氨PET/CT在瑞加腺苷刺激期间和静息时测定心肌灌注及以mL/g/min为单位的MBF,并计算相应的心肌血流储备(MFR = 应激状态下的MBF/静息状态下的MBF)。在存在与应激相关的灌注缺损且狭窄≥50%的心肌区域(区域1)、无缺损但狭窄≥50%的区域(区域2)或无狭窄≥50%的区域(区域3)评估MBF参数。在区域1 - 3中,充血状态下的MBF在中远端显著低于左心室中部心肌[中位数和四分位间距:1.57(1.24,1.84)对比1.87(1.61,2.00),以及1.23(1.11,1.86)对比1.89(1.80,1.97),还有1.78(1.48,2.00)对比1.94(1.84,2.05)mL/g/min,P < 0.0001]。充血血流期间产生的纵向MBF梯度在区域2中分别比区域1和区域3更显著[-0.46(-0.70,-0.10)对比 -0.17(-0.29,-0.11)和 -0.15(-0.25,-0.09)mL/g/min,P < 0.01]。充血状态下的纵向MBF梯度与FFR之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.95;P < 0.0001),而这种关联在相应的MFR中则不太明显(r = 0.50;P = 0.006)。
充血血流期间观察到的纵向MBF梯度与经有创测量的FFR之间的密切相关性表明纵向血流梯度是一种新兴的用于评估血流受限性CAD的无创指标。