Boccia Delia, Pedrazzoli Debora, Wingfield Tom, Jaramillo Ernesto, Lönnroth Knut, Lewis James, Hargreaves James, Evans Carlton A
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.
Infectious Disease & Immunity and Wellcome Trust Centre for Global Health Research, Imperial College, London, UK.
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 21;16:307. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1529-8.
Cash transfer interventions are forms of social protection based on the provision of cash to vulnerable households with the aim of reduce risk, vulnerability, chronic poverty and improve human capital. Such interventions are already an integral part of the response to HIV/AIDS in some settings and have recently been identified as a core element of World Health Organization's End TB Strategy. However, limited impact evaluations and operational evidence are currently available to inform this policy transition.
This paper aims to assist national tuberculosis (TB) programs with this new policy direction by providing them with an overview of concepts and definitions used in the social protection sector and by reviewing some of the most critical operational aspects associated with the implementation of cash transfer interventions. These include: 1) the various implementation models that can be used depending on the context and the public health goal of the intervention; 2) the main challenges associated with the use of conditionalities and how they influence the impact of cash transfer interventions on health-related outcomes; 3) the implication of targeting diseases-affected households and or individuals versus the general population; and 4) the financial sustainability of including health-related objectives within existing cash transfer programmes. We aimed to appraise these issues in the light of TB epidemiology, care and prevention. For our appraisal we draw extensively from the literature on cash transfers and build upon the lessons learnt so far from other health outcomes and mainly HIV/AIDS.
The implementation of cash transfer interventions in the context of TB is still hampered by important knowledge gaps. Initial directions can be certainly derived from the literature on cash transfers schemes and other public health challenges such as HIV/AIDS. However, the development of a solid research agenda to address persisting unknowns on the impact of cash transfers on TB epidemiology and control is vital to inform and support the adoption of the post-2015 End TB strategy.
现金转移干预措施是一种社会保护形式,其基础是向脆弱家庭提供现金,旨在降低风险、减少脆弱性、缓解长期贫困并改善人力资本。在某些情况下,此类干预措施已成为应对艾滋病毒/艾滋病工作的一个组成部分,最近还被确定为世界卫生组织《终止结核病战略》的一个核心要素。然而,目前关于这一政策转变的影响评估和操作证据有限。
本文旨在通过向各国结核病规划提供社会保护部门所使用的概念和定义概述,并回顾与现金转移干预措施实施相关的一些最关键操作方面,来协助其适应这一新的政策方向。这些方面包括:1)可根据具体情况和干预措施的公共卫生目标使用的各种实施模式;2)与使用条件相关的主要挑战以及它们如何影响现金转移干预措施对健康相关结果的影响;3)针对受疾病影响的家庭和/或个人与针对普通人群的影响;4)将与健康相关的目标纳入现有现金转移计划的财务可持续性。我们旨在根据结核病流行病学、护理和预防情况评估这些问题。为了进行评估,我们广泛借鉴了关于现金转移的文献,并借鉴了迄今为止从其他健康结果(主要是艾滋病毒/艾滋病)中吸取的经验教训。
在结核病背景下实施现金转移干预措施仍受到重大知识空白的阻碍。初步方向当然可以从关于现金转移计划和其他公共卫生挑战(如艾滋病毒/艾滋病)的文献中得出。然而,制定一个坚实的研究议程以解决关于现金转移对结核病流行病学和控制影响的持续未知问题,对于为2015年后《终止结核病战略》的采用提供信息和支持至关重要。