Puram Sidharth V, Bhattacharyya Neil
Department of Otolaryngology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Nov;155(5):733-739. doi: 10.1177/0194599816654689. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
to determine national benchmarks for established quality indicators in head and neck cancer (HNCA) surgery, focusing on differences between academic and nonacademic institutions.
Cross-sectional analysis of national database.
HNCA surgery admissions from the 2009-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were analyzed for preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors influencing quality indicators after HNCA surgery. Quality metrics-including length of stay (LOS), inpatient death, return to the operating room (OR), wound infection, and transfusion-were compared for academic versus nonacademic institutions.
A total of 38,379 HNCA surgery inpatient admissions (mean age, 56.5 years; 52.4% male) were analyzed (28,288 teaching vs 10,091 nonteaching). Nationally representative quality metrics for HNCA surgery were as follows: mean LOS, 4.26 ± 0.12 days; return to OR, 3.3% ± 0.2%; inpatient mortality, 0.7% ± 0.1%; wound infection rate, 0.9% ± 0.1%; wound complication rate, 4.3% ± 0.2%; and transfusion rate, 4.3% ± 0.3%. HNCA surgery patients at teaching hospitals had a greater proportion of males, radiation history, and high-acuity procedures and greater comorbidity scores (all P < .001). Multivariate analyses adjusting for age, sex, income, payer, prior radiation, comorbidity scores, and procedural acuity demonstrated that teaching hospitals had a slightly increased LOS (+0.30 days; P = .009) and odds ratio for wound infection (1.54; 95% CI: 1.22-1.94) versus nonteaching hospitals. There were no significant differences in return to OR (P = .271), inpatient mortality (P = .686), or transfusion rate (P = .960).
Despite caring for substantially more complex HNCA surgery patients with greater comorbidities, teaching hospitals demonstrate only a marginally increased LOS and wound complication rate versus nonteaching hospitals, while other established quality metrics are similar.
确定头颈癌(HNCA)手术既定质量指标的全国基准,重点关注学术机构与非学术机构之间的差异。
对国家数据库进行横断面分析。
分析2009 - 2011年全国住院患者样本中HNCA手术的入院患者的术前特征和术后结果。采用多变量分析确定影响HNCA手术后质量指标的因素。比较学术机构与非学术机构的质量指标,包括住院时间(LOS)、住院死亡、返回手术室(OR)、伤口感染和输血情况。
共分析了38379例HNCA手术住院患者(平均年龄56.5岁;52.4%为男性)(28288例教学医院患者与10091例非教学医院患者)。HNCA手术全国代表性的质量指标如下:平均住院时间4.26±0.12天;返回手术室率3.3%±0.2%;住院死亡率0.7%±0.1%;伤口感染率0.9%±0.1%;伤口并发症率4.3%±0.2%;输血率4.3%±0.3%。教学医院的HNCA手术患者中男性、有放疗史、高急症手术的比例更高,合并症评分也更高(均P <.001)。对年龄、性别、收入、付款人、既往放疗、合并症评分和手术急症进行多变量分析后发现,与非教学医院相比,教学医院的住院时间略有延长(+0.30天;P =.009),伤口感染的比值比为1.54(95%CI:1.22 - 1.94)。返回手术室率(P =.271)、住院死亡率(P =.686)或输血率(P =.960)无显著差异。
尽管教学医院诊治的HNCA手术患者病情复杂得多且合并症更多,但与非教学医院相比,教学医院的住院时间和伤口并发症率仅略有增加,而其他既定质量指标相似。