Fouda Usama M, Elsetohy Khaled A, Elshaer Hesham S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):962-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
To determine whether the unidirectional knotless barbed suture can be used to control bleeding from the endometrioma bed after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma, and to detect whether the use of the unidirectional barbed suture is associated with shorter suturing time of the endometrioma bed compared with the continuous conventional smooth suture with intracorporeal knot tying.
Randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
Tertiary hospital.
Forty patients with unilateral ovarian endometrioma (mean diameter, 3-10 cm) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the barbed suture group or the conventional suture group.
The endometrioma bed was sutured either with unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc 180; Covidien, Mansfield, MA) or conventional suture (Vicryl; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Two layers of continuous sutures were used to control bleeding from the endometrioma bed and to reapproximate the ovarian edges.
The degree of suturing difficulty was evaluated by the surgeons using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 1 (least difficult suturing) to 10 (most difficult suturing). Operating time and suturing time were significantly shorter in the barbed suture group (43.3 ± 10.54 vs 52.8 ± 9.69 minutes; p = .005 and 8.85 ± 2.52 vs 15.7 ± 4.12 minutes; p < .001, respectively). Suturing with barbed suture was less difficult than suturing with conventional suture (3.68 ± 1.37 vs 4.77 ± 1.56; p = .025). Intraoperative blood loss was similar in the 2 groups. No perioperative complications were reported in either group. A nonsignificant decrease in serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels was observed after the operation in the barbed suture group and the conventional suture group (3.04 ± 1.5 vs 2.52 ± 1.31 ng/mL; p = .252 and 2.76 ± 1.48 vs 2.13 ± 1.14 ng/mL; p = .139, respectively). The rate of decline in serum AMH levels after the operation was 18.32% in the barbed suture group and 22.84% in the conventional suture group.
The unidirectional knotless barbed suture (V-Loc) facilitates suturing of the endometrioma bed after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma. Compared with conventional smooth suture (Vicryl), the unidirectional barbed suture reduces the time needed to suture the endometrioma bed and the total operating time.
确定单向无结倒刺缝线在腹腔镜下切除卵巢子宫内膜瘤后能否用于控制子宫内膜瘤床的出血,并检测与体内打结的连续传统光滑缝线相比,使用单向倒刺缝线是否与子宫内膜瘤床的缝合时间缩短有关。
随机临床试验(加拿大工作组分类I)。
三级医院。
40例单侧卵巢子宫内膜瘤患者(平均直径3 - 10厘米)按1:1比例随机分为倒刺缝线组或传统缝线组。
用单向倒刺缝线(V-Loc 180;柯惠医疗,马萨诸塞州曼斯菲尔德)或传统缝线(薇乔;爱惜康,新泽西州萨默维尔)缝合子宫内膜瘤床。使用两层连续缝线控制子宫内膜瘤床出血并使卵巢边缘重新对合。
外科医生使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估缝合难度,范围为1(最容易缝合)至10(最难缝合)。倒刺缝线组的手术时间和缝合时间显著更短(分别为43.3±10.54分钟对52.8±9.69分钟;p = 0.005以及8.85±2.52分钟对15.7±4.12分钟;p < 0.001)。使用倒刺缝线缝合比使用传统缝线更轻松(3.68±1.37对4.77±1.56;p = 0.025)。两组术中失血量相似。两组均未报告围手术期并发症。倒刺缝线组和传统缝线组术后血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平均出现非显著性下降(分别为3.04±1.5对2.52±1.31纳克/毫升;p = 0.252以及2.76±1.48对2.13±1.14纳克/毫升;p = 0.139)。倒刺缝线组术后血清AMH水平下降率为18.32%,传统缝线组为22.84%。
单向无结倒刺缝线(V-Loc)有助于在腹腔镜下切除卵巢子宫内膜瘤后缝合子宫内膜瘤床。与传统光滑缝线(薇乔)相比,单向倒刺缝线减少了缝合子宫内膜瘤床所需时间和总手术时间。