Friess Daniel A, Thompson Benjamin S, Brown Ben, Amir A Aldrie, Cameron Clint, Koldewey Heather J, Sasmito Sigit D, Sidik Frida
Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, 117570, Singapore.
Yayasan Hutan Biru-Blue Forests, Makassar, 90231, Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Conserv Biol. 2016 Oct;30(5):933-49. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12784. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
Many drivers of mangrove forest loss operate over large scales and are most effectively addressed by policy interventions. However, conflicting or unclear policy objectives exist at multiple tiers of government, resulting in contradictory management decisions. To address this, we considered four approaches that are being used increasingly or could be deployed in Southeast Asia to ensure sustainable livelihoods and biodiversity conservation. First, a stronger incorporation of mangroves into marine protected areas (that currently focus largely on reefs and fisheries) could resolve some policy conflicts and ensure that mangroves do not fall through a policy gap. Second, examples of community and government comanagement exist, but achieving comanagement at scale will be important in reconciling stakeholders and addressing conflicting policy objectives. Third, private-sector initiatives could protect mangroves through existing and novel mechanisms in degraded areas and areas under future threat. Finally, payments for ecosystem services (PES) hold great promise for mangrove conservation, with carbon PES schemes (known as blue carbon) attracting attention. Although barriers remain to the implementation of PES, the potential to implement them at multiple scales exists. Closing the gap between mangrove conservation policies and action is crucial to the improved protection and management of this imperiled coastal ecosystem and to the livelihoods that depend on them.
红树林丧失的许多驱动因素作用范围广泛,最有效的应对方式是通过政策干预。然而,各级政府存在相互冲突或不明确的政策目标,导致管理决策相互矛盾。为解决这一问题,我们考虑了四种在东南亚地区正越来越多地被采用或可加以应用的方法,以确保可持续生计和生物多样性保护。其一,将红树林更有力地纳入海洋保护区(目前海洋保护区主要侧重于珊瑚礁和渔业),这可以解决一些政策冲突,并确保红树林不会出现政策空白。其二,社区与政府共同管理的例子是存在的,但实现大规模的共同管理对于协调利益相关者和解决相互冲突的政策目标至关重要。其三,私营部门的举措可以通过现有机制以及针对退化地区和未来受威胁地区的新机制来保护红树林。最后,生态系统服务付费(PES)对于红树林保护极具潜力,其中碳生态系统服务付费计划(即所谓的蓝碳)备受关注。尽管生态系统服务付费的实施仍存在障碍,但在多个层面实施该计划的潜力是存在的。弥合红树林保护政策与行动之间的差距,对于更好地保护和管理这片濒危的沿海生态系统以及依赖它们的生计至关重要。