Castro-Sánchez Adelaida María, Lara-Palomo Inmaculada Carmen, Matarán-Peñarrocha Guillermo A, Saavedra-Hernández Manuel, Pérez-Mármol José Manuel, Aguilar-Ferrándiz María Encarnación
1 Department of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Medicine, University of Almeria , Almeria, Spain .
2 Primary Health Care , Andalucia Health Service, Andalucia, Spain .
J Altern Complement Med. 2016 Aug;22(8):650-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0068. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
To evaluate the effects of craniosacral therapy on disability, pain intensity, quality of life, and mobility in patients with low back pain.
A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Sixty-four patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (mean age ± SD, 50 ± 12 years; 66% female) who were referred for physical therapy at a clinical unit of the Health Science School of the University of Almeria (Spain).
Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group (10 sessions of craniosacral therapy) or a control group (10 sessions of classic massage).
Disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMQ, primary outcome] and Oswestry Disability Index), pain intensity (10-point numeric pain rating scale), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), isometric endurance of trunk flexor muscles (McQuade test), lumbar mobility in flexion, hemoglobin oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hemodynamic measures (cardiac index), and biochemical estimation of interstitial fluid. These outcomes were registered at baseline, after treatment, and 1-month follow-up.
No statistically significant differences were seen between groups for the main outcome of the study, the RMQ (p = 0.060). However, patients receiving craniosacral therapy experienced greater improvement in pain intensity (p ≤ 0.008), hemoglobin oxygen saturation (p ≤ 0.028), and systolic blood pressure (p ≤ 0.029) at immediate- and medium-term and serum potassium (p = 0.023) level and magnesium (p = 0.012) at short-term than those receiving classic massage.
Ten sessions of craniosacral therapy resulted in a statistically greater improvement in pain intensity, hemoglobin oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, serum potassium, and magnesium level than did 10 sessions of classic massage in patients with low back pain.
评估颅骶疗法对腰痛患者残疾程度、疼痛强度、生活质量和活动能力的影响。
单盲随机对照试验。
64例慢性非特异性腰痛患者(平均年龄±标准差,50±12岁;66%为女性),他们被转介到西班牙阿尔梅里亚大学健康科学学院的一个临床科室接受物理治疗。
参与者被随机分配到实验组(10次颅骶疗法)或对照组(10次经典按摩)。
残疾程度(罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷[RMQ,主要观察指标]和奥斯威斯利残疾指数)、疼痛强度(10分数字疼痛评分量表)、运动恐惧(坦帕运动恐惧量表)、躯干屈肌等长耐力(麦奎德试验)、腰椎前屈活动度、血红蛋白氧饱和度、收缩压、舒张压、血流动力学指标(心脏指数)以及组织间液的生化测定。这些观察指标在基线、治疗后和1个月随访时进行记录。
在研究的主要观察指标RMQ方面,两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.060)。然而,接受颅骶疗法的患者在即刻和中期的疼痛强度(p≤0.008)、血红蛋白氧饱和度(p≤0.028)和收缩压(p≤0.029)以及短期的血清钾水平(p = 0.023)和镁水平(p = 0.012)方面比接受经典按摩的患者有更大改善。
对于腰痛患者,10次颅骶疗法在疼痛强度、血红蛋白氧饱和度、收缩压、血清钾和镁水平方面的改善在统计学上比10次经典按摩更显著。