Pandya Bhavi, Spagnola Jonathan, Sheikh Azfar, Karam Boutros, Anugu Viswajit Reddy, Khan Asif, Lafferty James, Kenigsberg David, Kowalski Marcin
Department of Internal Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Staten Island University Hospital, USA.
J Arrhythm. 2016 Jun;32(3):204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
Anti-arrhythmic medications (AAMs) are known to increase cardiac mortality significantly due to their pro-arrhythmic effects. However, the effect of AAMs on non-cardiac mortality has not been evaluated.
Trials published in English language journals from 1990 to 2015 were thoroughly retrieved by searching websites such as PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials reporting non-cardiac deaths as primary or secondary outcomes were used to compare AAMs to non-arrhythmic therapy (AV nodal blocking agents, implantable cardiovascular defibrillation (ICD), or placebo). Information regarding the sample size, treatment type, baseline characteristics, and outcomes was obtained by using a standardized protocol. The fixed effect model was used to perform meta-analysis, and results were expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR) with confidence interval (CI) of 95%, inter study heterogeneity was assessed using I (2). Intention to treat principle was applied to extract data.
Total of 18,728 patients were enrolled in 15 trials; 9359 patients received AAMs and 9369 received non-arrhythmic therapy. AAMs were associated with an increased risk of non-cardiac mortality (OR=1.30, [95% CI: 1.12, 1.50], p=0.0005, I (2) index=24%) and all-cause mortality (OR=1.09, [95% CI: 1.01, 1.18], p=0.04, I (2)=54%) as compared to non-arrhythmic therapy. There was no difference in the cardiac mortality (OR=1.01, [95% CI: 0.92, 1.11], p=0.82, I (2)=53%) or arrhythmic mortality (OR=1.00, [95% CI: 0.89, 1.13], p=0.94, I (2)=64%) between the two groups.
AAMs are associated with an increased risk of non-cardiac and all-cause mortality. The effect of AAMs, especially amiodarone, on non-cardiac mortality requires further evaluation.
抗心律失常药物(AAMs)因其促心律失常作用而显著增加心脏死亡率。然而,AAMs对非心脏死亡率的影响尚未得到评估。
通过检索如PubMed、Medline、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术等网站,全面检索了1990年至2015年发表在英文期刊上的试验。将报告非心脏死亡作为主要或次要结局的随机对照试验用于比较AAMs与非心律失常治疗(房室结阻滞剂、植入式心血管除颤器(ICD)或安慰剂)。通过使用标准化方案获取有关样本量、治疗类型、基线特征和结局的信息。采用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析,结果以比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)表示,使用I²评估研究间异质性。采用意向性治疗原则提取数据。
15项试验共纳入18728例患者;9359例患者接受AAMs治疗,9369例接受非心律失常治疗。与非心律失常治疗相比,AAMs与非心脏死亡率增加相关(OR = 1.30,[95% CI:1.12, 1.50],p = 0.0005,I²指数 = 24%)以及全因死亡率增加相关(OR = 1.09,[95% CI:1.01, 1.18],p = 0.04,I² = 54%)。两组间心脏死亡率(OR = 1.01,[95% CI:0.92, 1.11],p = 0.82,I² = 53%)或心律失常死亡率(OR = 1.00,[95% CI:0.89, 1.13],p = 0.94,I² = 64%)无差异。
AAMs与非心脏及全因死亡率增加相关。AAMs,尤其是胺碘酮,对非心脏死亡率的影响需要进一步评估。