治疗扁桃体炎的抗生素:急诊科应效仿全科医疗吗?
Antibiotics for tonsillitis: should the emergency department emulate general practice?
作者信息
Kanji Kamil, Saatci Defne, Rao Gopal G, Khanna Priya, Bassett Paul, Williams Bhanu, Khan Murtuza
机构信息
Department of Paediatrics, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Department of Microbiology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
出版信息
J Clin Pathol. 2016 Sep;69(9):834-6. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203808. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether antibiotics are prescribed appropriately for acute tonsillitis in an emergency department (ED).
METHODS
Cross-sectional observational study in large district general hospital in London. Patients diagnosed and coded with 'acute tonsillitis' in the ED over a 3-month period in 2015. Medical records were reviewed for Centor criteria, which is a clinical scoring system to guide antibiotic prescribing in UK general practice. Drug charts were reviewed for the specific antibiotic(s) prescribed, and throat swab (TS) cultures were recorded.
RESULTS
273/389 patients with tonsillitis were analysed-186 children, 87 adults. Exclusions were missing patient records (86), patients had/awaiting tonsillectomy (22), receiving antibiotics (6) and immunocompromised (2). Centor score (CS) was not recorded for any patient. Based on derived CS from documented signs/symptoms, antibiotics were prescribed inappropriately to 196/273 patients (80%; 95% CI 74% to 85%) including broad-spectrum antibiotics to 25%. These included co-amoxiclav (18%), amoxicillin (6%), azithromycin (0.5%) and ceftriaxone (0.5%). TSs were taken in 66/273(24%) patients; 10/66 were positive for group A streptococcus (GAS). However, 48/56 GAS negative patients were prescribed antibiotics.
CONCLUSIONS
CS was not being used in the ED to guide antibiotic prescribing for acute tonsillitis. Antibiotic prescribing was based on clinical judgement. Based on derived CS (<3), 80% of patients were inappropriately prescribed antibiotics, particularly broad-spectrum antibiotics. Further studies need to assess use of CS to guide antibiotic prescription in ED. TSs were commonly performed in the ED but did not either improve diagnosis or guide antibiotic prescription.
目的
确定在急诊科(ED)急性扁桃体炎患者的抗生素处方是否合理。
方法
在伦敦一家大型地区综合医院进行横断面观察性研究。纳入2015年3个月期间在急诊科诊断并编码为“急性扁桃体炎”的患者。查阅病历以评估用于指导英国全科医疗抗生素处方的临床评分系统——森托标准(Centor criteria)。查看药物图表以了解所开具的具体抗生素,并记录咽拭子(TS)培养结果。
结果
对273例扁桃体炎患者进行了分析,其中186例为儿童,87例为成人。排除标准为患者记录缺失(86例)、患者已进行或正在等待扁桃体切除术(22例)、正在接受抗生素治疗(6例)以及免疫功能低下(2例)。未对任何患者记录森托评分(CS)。根据记录的体征/症状得出的CS,196/273例患者(80%;95%置信区间74%至85%)抗生素处方不合理,其中25%为广谱抗生素。这些包括阿莫西林克拉维酸钾(18%)、阿莫西林(6%)、阿奇霉素(0.5%)和头孢曲松(0.5%)。273例患者中有66例(24%)进行了TS检测;66例中有10例A组链球菌(GAS)检测呈阳性。然而,56例GAS阴性患者中有48例开具了抗生素。
结论
急诊科未使用CS来指导急性扁桃体炎的抗生素处方。抗生素处方基于临床判断。根据得出的CS(<3),80%的患者抗生素处方不合理,尤其是广谱抗生素。需要进一步研究评估CS在急诊科指导抗生素处方的应用。急诊科通常进行TS检测,但既未改善诊断也未指导抗生素处方。