Schmocker Ryan K, Vanness David J, Macke Ryan A, Akhter Shahab A, Maloney James D, Blasberg Justin D
Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Department of Population Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.043. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
Air leaks after lobectomy are associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and protracted resource utilization. Portable drainage systems (PDS) allow for outpatient management of air leaks in patients otherwise meeting discharge criteria. We evaluated the safety and cost efficiency of a protocol for outpatient management of air leaks with a PDS.
We retrospectively assessed patients who underwent lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer at our institution between 2004 and 2014. All patients discharged with a PDS for air leak were included in the analysis. The study group was compared to an internally matched cohort of patients undergoing lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer managed without the need for outpatient PDS. Study end points included resource utilization, postoperative complications, and readmission.
A total of 739 lobectomies were performed during the study period, 73 (10%) patients with air leaks were discharged with a PDS after fulfilling postoperative milestones. Shorter LOS was observed in the study group (3.88 ± 2.4 versus 5.68 ± 5.7 d, P = 0.014) without significant differences in 30-d readmission (11.7% versus 9.0%, P = 0.615). PDS-related complications occurred in 6.8% of study patients (5/73), and 2.7% (2/73) required overnight readmission. PDSs were used for 8.30 ± 4.5 outpatient days. A CMS-based cost analysis predicted an overall savings of $686.72/patient (4.9% of Medicare reimbursement for a major thoracic procedure), associated with significantly fewer hospital days and resources used.
In patients otherwise meeting discharge criteria, outpatient management of air leaks is safe and effective. This strategy is associated with improved efficiency of postoperative care and a modest reduction in hospital costs. This model may be applicable to other thoracic procedures associated with protracted LOS.
肺叶切除术后漏气与住院时间延长及资源长期利用相关。便携式引流系统(PDS)可使原本符合出院标准的患者在门诊进行漏气处理。我们评估了使用PDS进行门诊漏气处理方案的安全性和成本效益。
我们回顾性评估了2004年至2014年间在本机构接受非小细胞肺癌肺叶切除术的患者。所有因漏气而携带PDS出院的患者均纳入分析。将研究组与一组内部匹配的接受非小细胞肺癌肺叶切除术且无需门诊PDS管理的患者队列进行比较。研究终点包括资源利用、术后并发症和再入院情况。
研究期间共进行了739例肺叶切除术,73例(10%)漏气患者在达到术后里程碑后携带PDS出院。研究组的住院时间较短(3.88±2.4天对5.68±5.7天,P = 0.014),30天再入院率无显著差异(11.7%对9.0%,P = 0.615)。6.8%(5/73)的研究患者发生了与PDS相关的并发症,2.7%(2/73)需要再次入院过夜。PDS使用了8.30±4.5个门诊日。基于医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的成本分析预测,每位患者总体节省686.72美元(占大型胸科手术医疗保险报销费用的4.9%),且住院天数和使用资源显著减少。
在原本符合出院标准的患者中,门诊处理漏气是安全有效的。该策略与术后护理效率提高及医院成本适度降低相关。这种模式可能适用于其他与住院时间延长相关的胸科手术。