Choe H, Tashiro C, Fukumitsu K, Yagi M, Yoshiya I
Department of Anesthesiology, Chonbuk University Medical School, Korea.
Crit Care Med. 1989 Jul;17(7):678-81. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198907000-00016.
Recorded values (SpO2) of oxygen saturation from six noninvasive pulse oximeters were compared to each other and to the value from a cooximeter. Simultaneous measurements were obtained from each instrument in eight healthy nonsmoking volunteers rendered hypoxic greater than 70% SpO2. Functional arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), fractional SaO2 (%HbO2), and percent fraction of carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) and methemoglobin (MetHb) were determined by a cooximeter. The difference between SaO2 and %HbO2 was 2.3 +/- 0.3 (SD) % (p less than .001) with 1.4 +/- 0.1% HbCO and 0.9 +/- 0.1% MetHb. The SpO2 values in two instruments were close to %HbO2, while the other instruments correlated approximately with SaO2. The greatest SpO2 difference among the instruments was 2.7 +/- 1.9% (p less than .001). These results may indicate that, under normal dyshemoglobin levels, some pulse oximeters are calibrated to estimate SaO2 and others to estimate %HbO2. Since the pulse oximeter using two wavelengths cannot measure accurately %HbO2 or SaO2 in the presence of dyshemoglobin, SpO2 values would be independent from %HbO2 and SaO2. A standard calibration method for pulse oximeters should be established by the manufacturers.
将六台无创脉搏血氧仪记录的氧饱和度值(SpO2)相互比较,并与一台血气分析仪的值进行比较。在八名健康非吸烟志愿者中,使他们的血氧饱和度低于70%,同时从每台仪器获取测量值。通过血气分析仪测定功能性动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)、氧合血红蛋白分数(%HbO2)、碳氧血红蛋白(HbCO)和高铁血红蛋白(MetHb)的百分比。SaO2与%HbO2之间的差异为2.3±0.3(标准差)%(p<0.001),其中HbCO为1.4±0.1%,MetHb为0.9±0.1%。两台仪器的SpO2值接近%HbO2,而其他仪器则与SaO2大致相关。仪器之间最大的SpO2差异为2.7±1.9%(p<0.001)。这些结果可能表明,在正常血红蛋白异常水平下,一些脉搏血氧仪校准用于估计SaO2,而其他的则用于估计%HbO2。由于使用两个波长的脉搏血氧仪在存在血红蛋白异常时无法准确测量%HbO2或SaO2,SpO2值将独立于%HbO2和SaO2。制造商应建立脉搏血氧仪的标准校准方法。