Department of Radiation Oncology, Greater Houston Physicians in Medicine Association, United States.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.027. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
Use of Rituximab for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has improved outcomes and led to further questions regarding the benefit of consolidative radiation therapy (RT). This study sought to determine changes in RT utilization following the incorporation of Rituximab for treatment of early stage DLBCL and to examine survival outcomes.
MATERIALS/METHODS: We included patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, diagnosed with Stage I-II DLBCL between 1992 and 2011. Linear regression was performed to determine rate of RT utilization over time during the pre- and post-Rituximab eras (1992-2001 vs. 2002-2011). Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression were performed to compare overall survival (OS) for patients treated with or without RT. Propensity-score matching was used to compare survival outcomes to account for indication bias.
34,680 patients met the specified criteria. RT utilization was 35.2% in the pre-Rituximab era and 29.9% in the post-Rituximab era (P<0.001). Linear regression revealed that in the pre-Rituximab era the slope of the best fit line for RT utilization by year was positive (m=0.01, P=0.0046), while the slope was negative in the post-Rituximab era (m=-0.008, P=0.0102). RT use was associated with improved OS in both the pre-Rituximab era (hazard ratio [HR]=0.797; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.756-0.841) and the post-Rituximab era (HR=0.745; 95% CI 0.702-0.789). Propensity-score matched analysis confirmed that RT use improved OS in the pre-Rituximab era (HR=0.844; 95% CI 0.793-0.897) and post-Rituximab era (0.754; 95% CI 0.703-0.809).
RT utilization has decreased following incorporation of Rituximab for first line treatment of DLBCL. RT use is associated with improved OS in both pre- and post-Rituximab eras, suggesting that RT should continue to be used for management of early stage DLBCL, even in the era of Rituximab.
利妥昔单抗在弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)中的应用改善了患者的预后,并引发了关于巩固性放疗(RT)获益的进一步问题。本研究旨在确定在利妥昔单抗用于治疗早期 DLBCL 后 RT 应用的变化,并探讨生存结果。
材料/方法:我们纳入了 Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results 数据库中的患者,这些患者在 1992 年至 2011 年间被诊断为Ⅰ-Ⅱ期 DLBCL。采用线性回归来确定在利妥昔单抗使用前后(1992-2001 年与 2002-2011 年)的 RT 使用率随时间的变化。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归比较了接受或未接受 RT 治疗的患者的总生存率(OS)。采用倾向评分匹配来比较生存结果,以纠正指示偏倚。
34680 名患者符合指定标准。在利妥昔单抗使用前时代,RT 使用率为 35.2%,而在利妥昔单抗使用后时代为 29.9%(P<0.001)。线性回归显示,在利妥昔单抗使用前时代,RT 使用率的最佳拟合线斜率为正(m=0.01,P=0.0046),而在利妥昔单抗使用后时代,斜率为负(m=-0.008,P=0.0102)。RT 的使用与利妥昔单抗使用前时代(风险比 [HR]=0.797;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.756-0.841)和利妥昔单抗使用后时代(HR=0.745;95% CI 0.702-0.789)的 OS 改善相关。倾向评分匹配分析证实,RT 的使用在利妥昔单抗使用前时代(HR=0.844;95% CI 0.793-0.897)和利妥昔单抗使用后时代(0.754;95% CI 0.703-0.809)均与 OS 改善相关。
利妥昔单抗用于一线治疗 DLBCL 后,RT 的使用率有所下降。RT 的使用与利妥昔单抗使用前时代和后时代的 OS 改善相关,这表明即使在利妥昔单抗时代,RT 仍应继续用于管理早期 DLBCL。