Suppr超能文献

利妥昔单抗维持治疗与单纯观察在一线或二线含利妥昔单抗化疗免疫治疗有反应的慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中的比较:AGMT CLL-8a Mabtenance随机试验的最终结果

Rituximab maintenance versus observation alone in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who respond to first-line or second-line rituximab-containing chemoimmunotherapy: final results of the AGMT CLL-8a Mabtenance randomised trial.

作者信息

Greil Richard, Obrtlíková Petra, Smolej Lukáš, Kozák Tomáš, Steurer Michael, Andel Johannes, Burgstaller Sonja, Mikušková Eva, Gercheva Liana, Nösslinger Thomas, Papajík Tomáš, Ladická Miriam, Girschikofsky Michael, Hrubiško Mikuláš, Jäger Ulrich, Fridrik Michael, Pecherstorfer Martin, Králiková Eva, Burcoveanu Cristina, Spasov Emil, Petzer Andreas, Mihaylov Georgi, Raynov Julian, Oexle Horst, Zabernigg August, Flochová Emília, Palášthy Stanislav, Stehlíková Olga, Doubek Michael, Altenhofer Petra, Pleyer Lisa, Melchardt Thomas, Klingler Anton, Mayer Jiří, Egle Alexander

机构信息

Third Medical Department at the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Salzburg Cancer Research Institute (SCRI), Salzburg, Austria; Cancer Cluster Salzburg (CCS), Salzburg, Austria.

First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Lancet Haematol. 2016 Jul;3(7):e317-29. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30045-X. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In many patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia requiring treatment, induction therapy with rituximab plus chemotherapy improves outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone. In this study we aimed to investigate the potential of rituximab maintenance therapy to prolong disease control in patients who respond to rituximab-containing induction regimens.

METHODS

In this randomised, international, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial, we enrolled patients who had achieved a complete response (CR), CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), or partial response (PR) to first-line or second-line rituximab-containing chemoimmunotherapy and randomly assigned them in a 1:1 ratio (central block randomisation in the electronic case report form system) to either intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m(2) every 3 months, or observation alone, for 2 years. Stratification was by country, line of treatment, type of chemotherapy added to the rituximab backbone, and degree of remission following induction. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. This is the final, event-triggered analysis. Final analysis was triggered by the occurrence of 92 events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01118234.

FINDINGS

Between April 1, 2010, and Dec 23, 2013, 134 patients were randomised to rituximab and 129 to observation alone. Median observation times were 33·4 months (IQR 25·7-42·8) for the rituximab group and 34·0 months (25·4-41·9) for the observation group. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the rituximab maintenance group (47·0 months, IQR 28·5-incalculable) than with observation alone (35·5 months, 95% CI 25·7-46·3; hazard ratio [HR] 0·50, 95% CI 0·33-0·75, p=0·00077). The incidence of grade 3-4 haematological toxicities other than neutropenia was similar in the two treatment groups. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 28 (21%) patients in the rituximab group and 14 (11%) patients in the observation group. Apart from neutropenia, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were upper (five vs one [1%] patient in the observation group) and lower (three [2%] vs one [1%]) respiratory tract infection, pneumonia (nine [7%] vs two [2%]), thrombopenia (four [3%] vs four [3%]), neoplasms (five [4%] vs four [3%]), and eye disorders (four [3%] vs two [2%]). The overall incidence of infections of all grades was higher among rituximab recipients (88 [66%] vs 65 [50%]).

INTERPRETATION

Rituximab maintenance therapy prolongs progression-free survival in patients achieving at least a PR to induction with rituximab plus chemotherapy, and the treatment is well tolerated overall. Although it is associated with an increase in infections, there is no excess in infection mortality, suggesting that remission maintenance with rituximab is an effective and safe option in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in early treatment phases.

FUNDING

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Medikamentöse Tumortherapie gemeinnützige GmbH (AGMT), Roche.

摘要

背景

在许多需要治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中,与单纯化疗相比,利妥昔单抗联合化疗的诱导治疗可改善预后。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨利妥昔单抗维持治疗对接受含利妥昔单抗诱导方案治疗后有反应的患者延长疾病控制时间的潜力。

方法

在这项随机、国际、多中心、开放标签的3期临床试验中,我们纳入了对一线或二线含利妥昔单抗的化疗免疫治疗达到完全缓解(CR)、骨髓恢复不完全的CR(CRi)或部分缓解(PR)的患者,并以1:1的比例(通过电子病例报告表系统进行中心区组随机化)将他们随机分配至每3个月静脉注射利妥昔单抗375 mg/m²或仅观察,为期2年。分层因素包括国家、治疗线数、添加到利妥昔单抗主干方案中的化疗类型以及诱导后的缓解程度。主要终点为无进展生存期。在意向性治疗人群中进行疗效分析。这是最终的事件触发分析。最终分析由92个事件触发。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT01118234。

结果

在2010年4月1日至2013年12月23日期间,134例患者被随机分配至利妥昔单抗组,129例患者仅接受观察。利妥昔单抗组的中位观察时间为33.4个月(IQR 25.7 - 42.8),观察组为34.0个月(25.4 - 41.9)。利妥昔单抗维持治疗组的无进展生存期显著长于单纯观察组(47.0个月,IQR 28.5 - 无法计算),而单纯观察组为35.5个月(95%CI 25.7 - 46.3;风险比[HR] 0.50,95%CI 0.33 - 0.75,p = 0.00077)。两个治疗组中非中性粒细胞减少的3 - 4级血液学毒性发生率相似。利妥昔单抗组有28例(21%)患者发生3 - 4级中性粒细胞减少,观察组有14例(11%)。除中性粒细胞减少外,最常见的3 - 4级不良事件为上呼吸道感染(利妥昔单抗组5例,观察组1例[1%])和下呼吸道感染(分别为3例[2%]和1例[1%])、肺炎(分别为9例[7%]和2例[2%])、血小板减少症(分别为4例[3%]和4例[3%])、肿瘤(分别为5例[4%]和4例[3%])以及眼部疾病(分别为4例[3%]和2例[2%])。所有级别感染的总体发生率在接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者中更高(88例[66%]对65例[50%])。

解读

利妥昔单抗维持治疗可延长接受利妥昔单抗联合化疗诱导治疗后至少达到PR的患者的无进展生存期,且总体耐受性良好。尽管其与感染增加相关,但感染死亡率并无增加,这表明在慢性淋巴细胞白血病的早期治疗阶段,用利妥昔单抗维持缓解是一种有效且安全的选择。

资助

德国抗肿瘤药物治疗协会(AGMT)、罗氏公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验