Mondello Patrizia, Steiner Normann, Willenbacher Wolfgang, Ferrero Simone, Ghione Paola, Marabese Alessandra, Pitini Vincenzo, Cuzzocrea Salvatore, Mian Michael
Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical, and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
Internal Medicine V, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Oncologist. 2016 Sep;21(9):1107-12. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0103. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
Despite the advent of new treatment strategies, many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse or die of the disease. Prospective clinical trials have demonstrated that lenalidomide is an effective and safe treatment option, especially for non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) DLBCL. However, routine clinical data are lacking, which is why we provide the results of the so-far largest relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL real-life analysis.
We retrospectively assessed 123 R/R DLBCL patients who received either 15 or 25 mg/day of lenalidomide from January 2006 to January 2015.
During a median follow-up period of 4.5 years, complete remission was achieved in 32% and a partial remission in 33% non-GCB patients compared with 0% and 3% in the GCB group (p < .001 and .001, respectively), with median response durations of 15 and 5 months, respectively (p < .001). Lenalidomide at 25 mg was superior to 15 mg in terms of response (complete remission 21% and partial remission 23% vs. 0% and 8%; p = .007 and .05) and median response duration (10 vs. 4 months; p = .03). Toxicity was limited and reversible. Median progression-free survival differed between non-GCB and GCB patients (37 vs. 30 months; p < .001) and between the two dosages (24 vs. 34 months; p = .002). However, overall survival was similar between the subgroups (38-42 months).
We provide evidence that lenalidomide is a valid treatment option for R/R DLBCL, with limited and reversible toxicity, and is more efficient in non-GCB DLBCL and at higher doses.
Despite the advent of new treatment strategies, many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse or die of the disease; hence, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. This study confirms that lenalidomide is a valid and well-tolerated treatment option for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Superior outcomes were observed in non-germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL, probably because of inhibition of the nuclear factor-κB pathway. Similarly, high drug doses resulted in greater clinical benefits. Overall, lenalidomide is a suitable therapeutic option for R/R DLBCL, especially in non-GCB DLBCL, and 25 mg/day dosing should be preferred.
尽管出现了新的治疗策略,但许多弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者仍会复发或死于该疾病。前瞻性临床试验表明,来那度胺是一种有效且安全的治疗选择,尤其对于非生发中心B细胞(non-GCB)DLBCL。然而,缺乏常规临床数据,这就是我们提供迄今为止最大规模的复发/难治性(R/R)DLBCL真实世界分析结果的原因。
我们回顾性评估了2006年1月至2015年1月期间接受15毫克/天或25毫克/天来那度胺治疗的123例R/R DLBCL患者。
在中位随访期4.5年期间,non-GCB患者的完全缓解率为32%,部分缓解率为33%,而GCB组分别为0%和3%(p分别<0.001和0.001),中位缓解持续时间分别为15个月和5个月(p<0.001)。25毫克来那度胺在缓解方面(完全缓解21%,部分缓解23%,对比0%和8%;p = 0.007和0.05)以及中位缓解持续时间(10个月对比4个月;p = 0.03)优于15毫克。毒性有限且可逆。non-GCB和GCB患者的中位无进展生存期不同(37个月对比30个月;p<0.001),两种剂量之间也不同(24个月对比34个月;p = 0.002)。然而,各亚组之间的总生存期相似(38 - 42个月)。
我们提供的证据表明,来那度胺是R/R DLBCL的有效治疗选择,毒性有限且可逆,在non-GCB DLBCL和高剂量时更有效。
尽管出现了新的治疗策略,但许多弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者仍会复发或死于该疾病;因此,迫切需要新的治疗方法。本研究证实,来那度胺是复发/难治性(R/R)DLBCL的有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择。在非生发中心B细胞(GCB)DLBCL中观察到更好的结果,可能是因为抑制了核因子-κB途径。同样,高药物剂量带来了更大的临床益处。总体而言,来那度胺是R/R DLBCL的合适治疗选择,尤其是在non-GCB DLBCL中,应首选25毫克/天剂量。